a geometrical approach to physics

-This article is still under construction-

Part 4: The Matrix explains particle as oscillation

The above, parts 1 to 3 of the MFT (Matrix Field Theory) creates a completely new basis for the axiomatic assumptions and forces a paradigm change for the understanding of physics. This is not just about a field theory or quantum theory, it is mainly about a theory of our worlds medium , here referred to as space-time pulses, the fabric of all, the matrix.

A particle is no longer a separate field, it is the state of the medium at this location.

From this perspective, no new particles are created in CERN, only the state of the location changes. All forces, all interactions arise from the disturbances of the original oscillation of space, of time (which also oscillates) and of the pulse.

Was ist die kopernikanische Wende (Revolution)? (a question in Quora)

The Copernican revolution is often used as an argument when a new insight changes the paradigm and the existing rules of list values hold against it, as happened back then. Although the Ptolemaic way of calculating was more accurate than Copernicus, it was wrong. It's the old battle between idea (intuition) and rules (list values). Today the majority of physicists still see a photon as a part-time particle, although it is only an oscillation, the spin as a torque where nothing can turn and space as empty, whereby it is the hardest thing in our universe. We too have our paradigm shift today.

What is considered to be empty space is just the manifestation of not yet awakened matter. Nikola Tesla

In part 4, the "particles" quarks, protons, neutrons, electrons, neutrinos with all their antiparticles are to be described in terms of space geometry, time geometry and force geometry. They should be explained as a special and therefore stable state of the matrix. The preconditions, the paradigms were described in parts 1-3. Briefly addressed in the following:

- The zero dimension with value 0 becomes a value as a multiple.
- The resulting 3 spatial dimensions form our conscious space.
- All forces can be traced back to the action of a 4th spatial dimension.
- Time is the reason why 3 dimensions are consciously perceived.
- The cause of time is the speed of light, which means simultaneity.
- Time is made up of cycles that end where they started.
- From our relation this means 180° forwards and 180° backwards (spin problem).
- Our universal cycle is in (+) time, we experience an apparent (+) time line.
- The super-symmetry (SUSY) is the view of our world from (-) time.
- The (-) time makes up the full cycle (spin 1) an equilibrium

With these paradigms all forces, charges and particles as well as photons should be describabel. This description shows a basic solution without a quantification. The methods of measurement in Coulomb, Newton etc. are not used, Planck’s quantum of action, h, is used as a unit.

The MFT as theory of new paradigms shows below the physical background .

Peering the medium of which fields (particles) consist

The tetrahedron-octahedron structure of the Matrix matrix enables 2 different spatial structures that are visible depending on the perspective. The tetrahedron space has a 60 ° structure and the octahedron space has a 90 ° structure (orthogonal). As I said, it's the same spatial structure. Depending on whether the tetrahedron or the octahedron is marked, the structure becomes tetrahedral with gaps in the shape of an octahedron or octahedral with gaps in between in the shape of a tetrahedron. Both perspectives are recognized here as MATRIX.

octahedralThe edges of the structures are connecting lines between fields, shown here as 4 colored spheres. The 4 colors are the 4 states (++) (+ -) (- +) (- -), which in the constellation of matrix result in an equilibrium in space-time and pulses. The peculiarity of this equilibrium is, that it can theoretically contain any density, strength and size of energy without affecting the neighboring space. It can withstand any scaling, whereby the distances can theoretically be of any size, including Planck's length (1.616 * 10^−32 mm). In this way energies of e=h/ʎ = ~1.5 * 10^15 MeV*s are recorded. The meaning of these numbers is difficult to estimate, since everything is unimaginably small and when scaled to our size, unimaginable strong. It must be kept in mind that everything is oscillating and the colors change in the scale of Planck’s length Lᵨ within Lᵨ / c or ~ 3 * 10^-33 sec. Because of this, it is irritating to work with values. We are working here with the scale 1 of the matrix and with the field distance 1 of the force as pulses of size 1 and the moment 1, which arises from the pulse * distance (1 * 1 = 1) and is the invariable Planckian efficiency h . The physicist wonders what the relationships between force, energy and pulse are. Since force and energy were defined by space and time units that are not possible at the scale of matrix, the term “pulse” was chosen.

Das Basic-Medium is in the field-scale 1

If pulse and distance are variable and h invariable then pulse becomes infinite at distance 0. It is clear that this makes no sense. The smallest size is required, which can be used as a reference for further considerations. The standard model (SM) uses Planck units here. There the Planck length  =  1.6*10^-25 meters, the Planck mass = 2.2 10-8 kg and the Planck time = 5.4 10-44 seconds. Since these values still use the reference of our normal world (meter, kg, second), they make no sense in QDT, since they are too strongly distorted by the theory of relativity or the Lorentz factor in the scale of the matrix.

Here, the geometric references should first be shown as a basis for understanding, in order then to include the relativistic distortion as a separate section. It therefore made sense for me to take the field size of a proton at the matrix scale S1 in order to explain the geometric relationships of other fields such as S2, S3, S4 etc.



The picture above clearly demonstrates the perspective of triangular and orthogonal space. It's the same structure. At one time the stages of space are related as colored spheres, at another time the diagonals of the same color are shown, which I call here the motorway of equal energies. It also shows a separately depicted octahedron, which, if lined up together, would in turn form an orthogonal structure by a different angle. All of these are prospects of the same spatial structure.

How to depicture geometrical space-dimensions

Knowing a dimension means to understand its geometry. As a first axiom, the dimension D0 must be given a size greater than zero. Only then does it exist (see dimensions). Only then can the conditions of dimension D1 be met. Only then can any number of dimensions manifest themselves as degrees of knowledge. The matrix theory gives us the tools to look more closely. The conditions are clearly definable:

1.) The same bar lengths on one scale, or its break-in in shorter lengths with a ratio of 1/3. This creates the conditions for an optimal harmony of its frequency.

2.) Everything oscillates. Here, too, the frequency is the measure. Space, time and energy therefore oscillates. The sum of these oscillations are always zero, it means stable.

3.) All considerations apply to stable states whose distances in its bar length and (because of V=c) in the frequency size are in the ratio 1/3^x (1-3-9-27-81 etc.). As the space between the states, a dynamic process arises with the aim of reaching the next stable state.

4.) These conditions go through all dimensions. The collapse into another dimension is found in a new multi-dimensional harmony or stability.

Dim 1

Example 1: Rod length 3 is compressed to rod length 1. As a graphic in D2-area, it is possible to show the shortening from S9 to S3 in such a way that the bending up into the new dimension D2 can again have stable rod lengths (of szes S1). You have to be aware that from D1 this bending up appears as  imaginary value. The imaginary value here would be the bending height H1=√2 (1^2 - 0.5^2)=0.866

Dim 2Example 2: Here only the compressed part is shown (white structure in D2). The representation in D3 allows here to show the bending up to the next higher dimension. At the same time, the bending-up height can be shown with the color yellow or green as a vector of the imaginary bending-up against compression or decompression, if the vertical is the indicator of pressure or depression. The white structure would then be the static zero value of space or entropy. The result is the bending heights H2 = √2(H1^2 - 0.5^2) = 0.785. H1 would be the imaginary value in D1 and H2 the imaginary value in D2.

Dim 3

Example 3: The octahedra with the rod lengths in white show the compressed area in D3. The octahedron consists of only 3 colors. It is the space between 8 tetrahedra, which however consist of 4 colors. One has to imagine the space D3 as a network of tetrahedra, where the octahedra are only spaces in between. Nevertheless, the process of energy balancing takes place in the octahedra. In their centers, the missing color of the 3 octahedron colors is formed as an energy balance. This is shown here as balls in green and yellow. The collapse in D4 dimension takes place in them as compensation. Since an isometry on a D2 surface has no way of representing the vector in D4, the D4 vectors remain imaginary.

Dim 3-4

In the adjacent picture, an attempt is made to represent the vectors according to D4 that are perpendicular to the diagonals as an area on the diagonals. The height of the bending up would be H3 = √2 (H2^2 - 0.5^2) = 0.731. H2 would be the imaginary value in D2 to D3. H3 would be the imaginary value in D3 to D4.


It can therefore be seen that imaginary vector values in the next higher dimension are possible in each dimension and establish a value relationship between the dimensions.


Collapse of bar force and bending up into the 4th spatial dimension

In every scale there is an equilibrium of the 4 states. Nevertheless disturbances or pulses from the environment are brought in to the equilibrium systems of tetrahedron and octahedron. The system (e.g. octahedron) changes its state accordingly. It transmits these disturbances back into the environment until an entropy again is reached, i.e. the disturbance becomes equal to the environment. During this process time, a resulting moment arises in the center of octahedron, the deficiency color. Normally, these processes work on a larger scale, e.g. S111 or higher. As shown in scale, the even-numbered scales are S2; S4; S6 etc. not able to absorb interference. They transmit them with V = c into the surrounding space or matrix structure. With scales such as S111, the rod lengths are shortened here to 1/111 until they become stable again with the shortening 2/111, i.e. with S109. On the other hand, shortening S7 to S5 will not happen like a normal transition from S(x) to S(x-2), since this has now the ratio of 2/7 (approx. 0.28). An imaginary bending up can expected here. As we could see in previous article, there is the inflection into the 4th spatial dimension in center of the affected octahedron. Well when exactly does this happen? The bar force phenomenon arises from 2 properties:

1. W =Resistance or elasticity of the rod medium (W = δ * L)
2. Fb=The bending force, a moment h/rod length=1 quant

While W is the resistance of the medium, the energy of a single rod is inversely proportional to the rod length d (e = h/d). This means that in this diagram (90° twisted) the scale can be seen as horizontal ordinate and the resistance as vertical ordinate. W would be seen there as a horizontal parallel to S (x), while Fb gives a progressive curve because of the geometry of matrix. The 2 curves will inevitably intersect where a bending of the bar force into the D4 is to be expected.
A list is shown here that compares the old values of the Standard Model (SM) with the new values. The new values are the implementation of the values of the SPIN theory to values of the oscillations and the old idea of super symmetry (SUSI) to parities of (+) and (-) time. The collapse as a bending up into the 4th spatial dimension is the foundation of the phenomenon of mass and inertia.

table of particle


This list is a landslide of paradigms. It is far from acceptable to any physicist. It is the result of matrix theory, a theory of an oscillating medium in 4 spatial dimensions, where localities, fields, regions depend on the resonance of the scale and the parity of the oscillation.

A prima Vista it is found that values of a hyper-space of the 4th dimension (horizontal ordinate) are assigned to the vertical ordinate of the 3D space. The 3D ordinate shows the different field scales here from S1-S18. The horizontal ordinate consists of (+) time and (-) time. The new values in the table are the result of the properties of space location respektive  matrix. It is astonishing to see that in general all particles have almost the same value designations. They differ mainly in their energy values. The left side of the list shows the excess force that creates the deficit color in the center of the octahedron in S1 – S5 (light red area), which bends into the 4D space (red bar). The mass phenomenon arises.

The new list:
1.) It shows the new values related to the geometry of the matrix.
2.) The new values do not include the terms spin and charge.
3.) It shows the old values of matter and antimatter (black and blue)
4.) It shows in the new values (+) time and (-) time instead of matter and antimatter
5.) No quarks are listed. They are no longer considerated as particles.
6.) No neutron is listed. This is explained in detail in the Neutron paragraph.

The explanation:

To 1: In the scales S1, S3, S5 the rod strength (force relationships between the 4 states) are so strong that the resistance in the entropy of space brakes. In the scales S2, S4, a rod strength cannot build up and flows into the environment until an entropy is reached. The scales > S6 generate outgoing amounts of energy, here photons. The scale > S7 generate energies that in principle remain local, generate a field of high energy (temperature), which, however, runs out at the edges and strives for entropy.
To 2: This is the hardest to understand. A spin as a torque cannot exsist in the matrix because the object that is supposed to rotate does not exist or is only a state of the location. The mesh of the matrix doesn´t change. The Stern-Gerlach experiment would produce the same results if instead of spin an oscillation with parities in (+) and (-) time were assumed.



is a term invented by physics that can only be explained with the charge itself. The term originated with the discovery of electricity. It was the flow of electrons to balance the electrical potential. Charge was therefore an excess or deficiency of the electrical potential. (+) was too many or (-) too little of the number of electrons. When charge values ​​(+) and (-) were used later for processes in the subatomic area, this of course no longer made sense. Since a (+) value has been assigned to a proton, it cannot be too many electrons. The charge became an inexplicable value or quantum number. However, the MFT explains charge as a status of the medium in 3D from the point of view of 4D (see illustration of the geometric spatial dimensions). Although the 3D medium as a network is only represented as a straight and plane surface, it also has values ​​from D4 point of view. These create compression and decompression zones in 3D network. The balance creates the phenomena of attraction and rejection. Since tension and pressure zones are the phenomena of local oscillations, the old term “charge” constantly changes its values ​​(+ -). The static value used in empirical research is now just a parity of the oscillation. From this point of view, a proton always and everywhere in space has the opposite value of an electron. Nothing is static in matrix space, it's just our point of view.

To 3: The list refers to the existing idea in physics that matter and antimatter are 2 separate things. This means that they annihilate each other, which is not possible in the MFT, since the equilibrium is an oscillation. From a mathematical point of view, zero is not nothing but the sum of the components of an eternally repetitive process that only becomes static on large scale in analog worlds. That is the main reason why space is not empty.

JinJang To 4: The magic cycle as shown here calculates the time for each event, whereby the 2nd part of the ½ spin particle (or new: field) forms a complete cycle with the 1st part. Here, antimatter becomes a cycle segment of matter. The two sides of the same thing are only recognized as one thing in 4D hyperspace.



To 5: At the beginning of this part 4 I wrote:
A particle is no longer a separate field, it is the state of the medium at this location.
Since fermions only arise in S1 - S5, they have the field spacing 1 - 5 as an octahedron. This has a weak point of the constellation in the center, the deficiency color , and a reinforcement in 3 diagonals of the corners in form of the same colors or states. In experiments in hadron collider, only 3 energy traces can be found during proton destruction. These in turn can only generate 2 values ​​in the magnetic field. This could be the reason that 3 particles were always included in the theory as triplets in 2 types (UP and Down). The “charge” as a further value was purely arithmetically divided up in such a way that a whole value of 1e (electric volts) is created as a triplet. The whole of particle research tries to shatter existing stable particles with more and more energy. The rubble is turned into particles with theoretical analyzes (laureate reasons or dissertations). There are only fragments, which proves the lifetime of the particles: protons about 10^25 years, longer than the universe, quarks only 10^-25 sec.

To 6: A neutron has the shape of an octahedron. It has the mass-generating bending center into the 4th spatial dimension. The 3 force-transmitting diagonals show up to us only in (+) time phase. It is the same as the proton, but has no "charge", i.e. the magic cycle does not give any determinable values. This phenomenon is the result of matrix oscillating of the 4D-ordinate. This means that a process can happen at the same time with the same pulse in the same place, if time is set as a hyper term over the local time of the cycle. This means that the time of the measuring instruments cannot record the (+ -) time of the cycle. The Pauli principle then still applies, since with the neutron 1 proton is packed in an electron but is in an unequal time cycle. A similar phenomenon can be observed when 2 electrons with their charge field share the same place in the K-shell. This place is 1 quant in size, but offers space for 1 quant in the (+) time status and one in the (-) time status of the shell-oscillation. As a result, a neutron has 2 charge fields. One from the proton and one in counterparity from the encompassing electron. However, these cancel out each other.

The Fermions

As described above, the fermions are the effective field centers of a 4D momentum in the 3D space plane. So they do not really exist in 3D space, but they have an effect there. In principle, they cannot be moved directly by energies of the 3D space, but only through the deformation of the 3D space plane, which, however, is subject to the limit V=c. Under the aspect that bosons are the 3D interaction between the fermions, they are bound to the interacting fields of the fermions and therefore limited in their range. Fermions are centers of energy that can be moved by attraction-repulsion of the matrix mesh. These are therefore deformations of the 3D space plane. It is the charge fields around these centers of force, the primary and secondary field hierarchies, that are responsible for more complex structures.

the birth of matter

Actually, the chapter should be written first. However, since terms had to be explained from the perspective of matrix, a possible process of this kind can only be understood here.

Birth of Matter

A process of culminating densities in space with simultaneous thinning of time (V = c becomes smaller and smaller from outside), where pressures arise that are similar to those of the galactic centers, can be imagined. Only a triangular structure in 2D or a tetrahedral structure in 3D would withstand such pressures without collapsing. Cells that are getting smaller and smaller will create cascades entropies of pressure, which in turn will create central zones with a bend into the next higher dimension.

Every process in the universe has a reversal process. In this case, the time spiral will run from the highest pressure ranges to the cells of greater expansion with lower pressure. However, since the bending up into the higher dimension, here the 4D space dimension, happens at right angles to the 3D space, this bending up will remain and have no reason to dilate. This bending up is then hurled as matter into the normal conditions of our 3D space. The creation of the phenomenon mass, however, is subject to the law of relativity and is determined by the Lorentz factor. The simple numerical proportions of the S1; S3; S5 etc. are not longer recognized as length ratios of the theoreticle matrix-distances. So e.g. a proton then is ~2000 more heavier than an electron.

The family relations of fermions

In this paper a symbolic graphic is used to explain the significant differences between the fermions. The diamond symbolizes an octahedron. Its 3 diagonals (only 2 shown here) are symbolized by the arrows. The blue and green dots show the parity of the space cells in S1 (scale 1). Here it becomes clear that only one color was indicated in the direction of the arrows. It is the diagonals that let asymmetrical energies run out into the environment with V=c. They are the debris of LHC research known as quarks. The central point shows the moment in D4 that creates the phenomenon of mass. The lines show the octahedron that forms the primary field. Its color shows its parity in relation to the proton.

ProtonProtons are the original race. They have the rod length of space size S1. S1 is the first size of the tetrahedron space, which can also be referred to as Unit 1 (U1), because with 4 colors they form the 1st unit size. According to research in particle physics, there are other family relationships that are, however, unstable and do not form complex structures. The philosophical basis of the matrix theory requires a harmonious relationship or resonance to the direct environment. The condition that everything, the medium and its disturbances are in a balancing relationship, the result of which is zero, means that surrounding secondary fields can be expected as oscillations. These can only be xpected in S3, S5: S7; S9 etc. since in this scale the geometric shapes (here as octahedra) have all the same center. Here it becomes clear that basically all fermions have the same geometric shape. They only differ in depth of the moment to the 4th dimension. The resulting differences are therefore in secondary fields, which results in the actual parity of their oscillation. E.g. if S1 = (+), then S3 = (-) and S5 = (+) etc.


The neutron consists of 1 proton and one positron. The reason for this union lies in their oscillation. It is assumed that there were states of extreme pressure in the universe or at its birth. Such states are assumed inside neutron stars. The particles are put under pressure in such a way that the area S3 around the proton (S1) also receives a 4D-bending moment, which is in fact equivalent to putting an positron (a electron in the (+) parity) around a proton. After overcoming the repelling force in S2, the positron can install itself in the same place as the proton, but on the (-) time phase of the oscillation. A neutron therefore has a balance in the subsequent fields S5-S7 and the charge fields S9-S27. In Standard Model it is the reverse process of beta decay. The corresponding Feynman diagrams suggest that the subsequent S5-S7 will also be affected. Unfortunately, all Feynman diagrams assume that there are no protons and instead show only the 3 LHC debris as quarks, with only one quark mutating. It is the old classic idea that even the smallest particle can be broken into even smaller particles. Particle in the emptiness of space but is an illusion.


electron is the little brother of the proton, it is exactly the same, but packed in an octahedron of size S3. So it has 3 times the rod length as the primary field environment of the 4D moment. This moment is the effect of an oscillation with a vector vertical to the 3D coordinates and has the opposite parity of the proton oscillation. Fused with a proton (i.e. it has the same center as the proton) it would cancel all subsequent fields. However, the normal state of an electron is its own separate unit. This interacts with the charge fields S9-S27 of protons and is responsible for the effects of periodic system. In theory, it also interacts with neutrinos S5 and S7. However, the proximity of the fields S5-S7 suggests a high resistance to S3, the amplitude development there is very steep (see interaction) and no interaction is to be expected. We have to be aware that our world is largely dependent on the interaction of electrons in the area of ​​the charge fields S9-S27.


The neutrino is symbolized by the red and blue lines opposite, established in the octahedron levels S5 and S7 above the electron. It is set in the table “table of particle” as the limit value between fermions and photons. Like the neutron, it consists of 2 centers of force, which seemingly alone as charge carriers in (+) and (-) time no longer have any effect on 3D space. This is probably the reason that made us discover only dual centers fields or particle. Perhaps experimental physics will one day be able to prove that the charge neutrino is the building block of the states of aggregation. The reason that it is considered a particle and not a boson is probably due to the fact that in S5 a minimal moment acts into the 4th dimension. In addition, the range S5-S7 is embedded in the harmonic range S3-S9 and thus has the highest resonance like a tone G to the octave C. The interaction of S5 and S7 (like the neutron S1 with S3) neutralizes the subsequent fields S9-S27, which means that the charge is eliminated. This is why it was so difficult to detect neutrinos at all.

Oktaeder Symmetrie

For the sake of clarity, it should be explained why octahedra are valid for the spatial extension of the fermions. As described above, it is the centers of the octahedron that collapse into the 4th space dimension. Strictly speaking, it is not even the 4th dimension of space that is bent into. It is the neighboring 3D plane above and below our plane (which is actually a space called the 3d plane here for ease of imagination). The 4th dimension of space is only the direction, the vector of the inflection. In the neighboring plane these inflected centers of the octahedron appear again as corner points of an octahedron. These corner points increase the energy level of the neighboring space or their octahedra. This creates a game of forces between the 3D levels, which in turn has repercussions on the now spatial neighboring zones of the fermion.


To understand this chapter, it is essential to read the chapter "The LHC fireworks reinterpreted" -> LHC-firework and "Matrix and the illusion of particle" -> illusion of particle  !

The SM regards quarks as the basis of our world. And that's only because the research in LHC (Large Hadron Collider) couldn't prove anything better. This research is based on the idea that everything has to be smashed to see what's inside. Expensive but not wrong. However, the interpretation of the results is wrong. The smallest units of our physical world can be shattered, but a rubble remains a rubble, it will never create the unit that has a lifetime of a particle, an x-fold age of our universe, if its own lifetime is only 10^-25 seconds (1/10 ... with 25 zeros). The matrix structure clearly shows that 3 diagonals of the octahedron are responsible for the creation of the manko color or the bending up into the 4D ordinate. In extension of the diagonal, the matrix shows that only energy centers with the same color status are located on this diagonal. They are considered as energy highways in matrix theory. The experiments in LHC will therefore constantly find pieces of debris as triplets with always the same energy values ​​in 2 parities, which were then defined as 3 quarks in 2 versions as UP or Down. Since this energy is also part of a destroyed oscillation, quarks were assigned with spin ½, whereby these rubbles were recognized as fermions. All just interpretation. Further pieces of debris resulted in the well-known “Particle Zoo”, which produced a lot of laureates. Quarks would have a Compton wavelength of about 200 times that of a proton, how should the proton be a container?

Although, strictly speaking, the oscillation of the center of a octahedron forms an energy field, when it is destroyed it can only move as a string out of particle energy system. This is clearly evident in the symmetry the picture below, where the diagonals of the octahedron consist of strings with only one color (or here the spatial property of the matrix). They are part of the entire directly affected space system, the octahedron, in center of which 3 diagonals intersect. It is 3 space coordinates that bend (collapse) in the octahedron into the 4th space dimension. As an oscillation, they bend in 2 directions perpendicular to the respective coordinate. Since the 3 new coordinates formed in this way do not belong to the 3 coordinates of the 3D space known to us, it must be imagined that the collapse of a diagonal actually counts as a compression / strain that, strictly speaking, cannot be depicted. Basically, a 4D vector force (the collapse) should not have any effect in 3D space, since the 4D vectors are perpendicular to the 3D coordinates. But the bending up in  4D-direction causes a shortening in direction to 3D-space what creates the relativistic effect of spatial density.



What has been achieved?

The concept of a multidimensional space, in which 4 dimensions are considered here, shows us a completely new field type, which in its abstraction could be described as a multiple field. This multiple field explains the internal structure of fermions. It shows the inner fields in the proton, the direct field around the pointlike impact of the oscillation in the 4th spatial dimension. This is followed by a field of repulsion, the Pauli field, then a field of attraction, the primary field of electron, than again repulsion, a field what has to be overcome to create neutrons. It is followed by the 2 fields of neutrinos (+ -) and then a field of attraction, which is also known as the charge field of electron orbital interactions. After a field of repulsion is an attraction-field responsible of the states of matter like solid, liquit, gasious etc. All separated by repelling fields. There are further fields of crystals and so on. The multiple fields show us a concept that recognizes the smallest particle as a field and extends this principle up to gravitation. A principle that unites all theories of physics and presents them in a single explanation.
The basis of this explanation is the matrix as the geometry of a 4-dimensional space and the quantized oscillations of all existing things, which only become recognizable in larger scale as analog and static manifestations of our knowen world.



Weinachten 2016 fing ich an, meine Idee einer Raum-Matrix in die Web-Page „Der Feldraum“ zu beschreiben. In den Jahren 2017 und 2018 wuchsen die Ideen in meinem Kopf und meiner 3D-CAD Plattform zu einem Zoo von Lösungen, die eine logische Ordnung verlangten. Im Juli 2018 fing ich an, diese Ideen in logischer Folge mit Word und Bild zu dokumentieren. Die einzelnen Themen produzierten sich selbst und versetzten mich mit ihren überraschenden Lösungen ins Stauen. Ich bin überzeugt, dass sie im eigentlichen Sinne nicht meine Ideen sind, sie sind intuitiv entstanden. In mir wuchs ein neues Bild der Physik, das ich nicht eigentlich erdachte, ich sah es.

Es ist eine neue Physik, die ein Multiverse zulässt, der Zeit eine neue Bedeutung gibt und mit den neuen Paradigmen Links zur Metaphysik zeigt. Physik ist und Geist sind grundsätzlich nicht getrenn.

Gunter Michaelis, Griesbach, den 26.08.2019