**Teil 4: Die Matrix considered particle as an
oscillation**

The above written, Part 1 to 3 of the MFT (Matrix Field Theory) creates a completely new basis of axiomatic assumptions and forces a paradigm shift for the understanding of physics. This is not just a field theory or quantum theory; it is mainly about a theory of the medium, here referred to as space-time-pulses..

A particle is no longer a field here, it is the state of the medium at that location.

From this point of view, CERN does not create any new particles; only the state and condition of the location changes. All forces, all interactions emerge from the disturbances of the original oscillation of space, of time (also it oscillates) and of the pulse. Instead of quantum numbers, only the state forms of the location are included in the calculation.

**Quora-Fragee **I answered in this way:

**What is the operniianischee shift (Revolution)?**

*The Copernican revolution is often used as
an argument when a new insight changes the paradigm and the old rules of
exact list values hold against it, as happened then. Although Ptolemaic
calculation was more accurate than Copernicus's, it was wrong. It is the old
battle between idea (intuition) and rule (list values). Today, the majority
of physicists still see the photon as a part-time particle, even though it's
only a oscillation, spin as torque where nothing can twist and space as empty,
even being the hardest thing in our universe. Today we also have our
paradigm shift.*

In Part 4 the "particles" of quarks, protons, neutrons, electrons,
neutrinos with all their antiparticles are described in terms of space
geometry, time geometry and force geometry. They should be explained as a
special and stable state of the matrix. The preconditions, the paradigms
were described in parts 1-3. Here briefly addressed:

The zero dimension
with value 0 gets a value as a multiple.

The resulting 3 dimensions of
space form our conscious space.

All forces can be traced back as action
of a fourth spatial dimension.

Time is the reason why 3 dimensions are
consciously perceived.

The cause of time is the speed of light, which
means simultaneity for us.

Time consists of cycles that end where they
started.

From our relation this means 180 ° forwards and 180 ° backwards
(spin problem).

Our universal cycle is in the (+) time, we experience an
apparent (+) time-line.

Super Symmetry (SUSY) is the view of our world
from (-) time.

The (-) time makes the full cycle (spin 1) to equilibrium.

These paradigms describe all forces, charges and particles as well as the photons. This description shows a fundamental solution without quantification. The measurement methods in Coulomb or Newton are not used, the Planck effect quant h is used as a unit. To demonstrate the implications of the paradigm shift, here's a YouTube video link:

*Will gives a
demonstration there with one of his jet ships, an approx. 1.00m VTO model,
an example of gravitational-controlled propulsion. As a field-effect
methodology it has no inertia or gravity. With enough energy, it could
probably reach the speed of light, as space-curvature calculations by
Miguel Alcubierre show.*

It is not the only research model in the world. Already in the 40th of the 20th century high-voltage electricity was tried out on gravitation. Fatal accidents and many unexpected side effects such as time travel and teleportation were the results. The time was not (and probably still is not) prepared. National egoism turned this research into "black projects" and deposed them from official research and science. Today it can be assumed that antigravity drives are used militarily.

**!!! Not every UFO is controlled from an extraterrestrial !!!**

The MFT as the theory of new paradigms will show here the physical background.

**A look at the medium from which particle and their fields consist
**

The tetrahedral octahedral structure of the Matrix allows 2 different spatial structures, which are visible depending on the angle of view. The tetrahedral space has a 60 ° structure and the octahedron space a 90 ° (orthogonal) structure. As I sad, it is the same space structure. Depending on whether the tetrahedron or octahedron is marked, the structure becomes tetrahedral with octahedral gaps or octahedral with tetrahedral gaps or interstices. Both perspectives are named here as MATRIX.

The edges of the structures are the connecting lines between the fields, shown here as 4 colored spheres. The 4 colors are the 4 states (++) (+ -) (- +) (- -), which in the constellation of the Matrix give equilibrium in space-time and pulses. The peculiarity of this equilibrium is that theoretically it can contain any density, strength and magnitude of energy without affecting the neighboring spaces. It can stand any scaling, the distances theoretically can have any size, even the Planckian length (1.616 * 10-32 mm). This records energies of e = h / ʎ = ~ 1.5 * 10 ^ 15 MeV * s. The importance of these numbers is difficult to estimate, since everything is unimaginably small and unimaginable values arise when scaling to our scale. It must be kept in mind that everything oscillates and the colors in the Planckian length Lᵨ change within Lᵨ / c or ~ 3 * 10 ^ -33 sec. That's why it's irritating to work with values. We work here with the scale 1 of the matrix and with the field distance 1 of the force as pulses of size 1 and the moment 1, which results from Pulse * distance (1 * 1 = 1) and is the invariable Planckian efficiency h. The physicist wonders what the relationships between force, energy and pulse are. Since power and energy were defined with space and time units that are not possible on the scale of the Matrix, the term "pulse" was used.

**The basic medium is in the field scale 1
**

If pulse and distance are variable and *h* is invariable then Pulse becomes
infinity at distance 0. It is clear that this makes no sense. A smallest
size is required, beyond which the matrix would collapse. Suppose it is Lᵨ,
then Pulse = ~ 1.5 * 10 ^ 15 MeV * s. We assume that this size pulse = 1 and
the field distance = 1 is the field scale 1 described in the matrix part 1.
primary structure

Also this scale should have a medium. However, we know that the scale ½ or ¼ etc. does not produce 100% equilibrium. The error in Equilibrium consists of 3 equal adjacent colors (see Part 1: Collapse to the Black Hole). The effect is there therefore a 3-fold pulse. So that the Planck's h is not violated as a rule, the distances at this location are 1/3 of the normal distance. It is the beginning of a general collapse, but it works only in the lower scales and is equalized in field scale 1 (S1) by 100% equilibrium. This forces us to assume that the field scale 1 is the basic medium, but that in principle allows higher standards. The arbitrary assumption that the base distance is at S5 (scale 5) or higher does not answer the question of "why" and thus remains wanton. It would be much wiser to assume that the base distance for the above reasons is at S1 (scale 1), but the Planck length would be much larger. This can only be clarified with the support of experiments, but is not relevant in finding the base size for particle formation.

**Collapse of the bar force and bending into the 4th space
dimension**

In each scale (S) there is equilibrium of the 4 states, nevertheless
disturbances or in this case pulses from the environment are introduced into
the equilibrium systems of tetrahedron and octahedron. The system (e.g.,
octahedron) changes its state accordingly. In space: Bigger or smaller, in
time: Faster or slower. It transmits these disturbances back into the
environment until entropy is achieved, that means the disturbance will be
the same as the environment. The other side of the disorder would be the
collapse. Here: The bar force of the system cannot transmit the size of the
disturbance. As we saw in the article before, there is a bending into the
4th space dimension in the center of the affected octahedron. Well, when
exactly does this happen? The phenomenon bar force arises from 2
characteristics:

1. Resistance or elasticity of the medium (R = δ * L)

2. The kink force (KF), a moment h / bar length = 1 quant

While R (here
light red) is a force / field space size S, the single bar force is
anti-proportional to the force (e = h / L). Thus, R can be thought of as
parallel to S, while KF gives a progressive curve. The 2 curves will
inevitably intersect. Below is a panel of particles that intersects there
where the neutrino is, as a limit of hadrons to quants (bosons).

**This Table is an avalanche of paradigm. **

A prima vista you see values of a 4th-dimension hyperspace are mapped to the vertical coordinate of 3D space. The 3D coordinate shows the different field sizes here from 1-12. The horizontal coordinate consists of the (+) time and (-) time. The new values of the table are the result of properties of the locality or Matrix. The left side of the list shows the excess force, which breaks the resistance in S 1-5 (bright red area) and bends into the 4D space (red bar). It creates the phenomenon of mass.

**The new list: **

1.) It shows the new values related
to the geometry of the Matrix.

2.) The new values do not include the
terms spin and charge.

3.) It shows the old values of matter and
antimatter (black and blue)

4.) It shows the new values of (+) time and
(-) time instead of matter and antimatter

5.) No quarks are listed. This
is explained in paragraph Quarks.

6.) No neutron is listed. This is
explained in detail in the paragraph Neutron.

**The explanation**

**To 1:** In the scales S1, S3, S5, the bar force (force
relationships between the 4 states) are so high that the resistance in
entropy of space collapse. In scales S2, S4, the bar force cannot build up
and flows into the environment until entropy is achieved. The quantities <S6
generate beaming amounts of energy, here photons. The quantities <S7
generate energies that remain basically local, generate a field of high
energy (temperature), but which can´t be hold at the edges and strives for
entropy.

**To 2: **This is the hardest to understand. A
**spin**
as a torque cannot happen in the Matrix because the object, which is to
rotate, does not exist or is only a local state. The Stern - Gerlach
experiment would give the same results if instead of spin an oscillation (+)
(-) of time would be assumed.

Charge is a term invented by physics that
is explained only with the charge itself. The term originated in the
discovery of electricity. It was the flow of electrons to balance the
entropy of the electrical potential. **Charge** was therefore
an abundance or deficiency of electrical potential. (+) was too much or (-)
too little of the number of electrons. Of course, when later applying the
charge values (+) and (-) for sub-atomic processes, that made no sense.
Since a (+) value has been assigned to a proton, this can not be too much of
an electron. The charge became an unexplained value or quantum number. The
MFT declares charge wave mechanically with a new wave type. The basis is a
new interpretation of gravitation. This forms a field of multi-wave
explained later, which generate quantum effects in the size range of the
electrons (about 10 ^ -10), which assign electrons to special places.

**To 3: **The list refers to the existing opinion of physics
that matter and antimatter are two separate things. That is, they annihilate
each other, which is not possible in the MFT, since the equilibrium is an
oscillation, not an extinction. Mathematically, zero is not nothing but the
sum of components of a process. That's the main reason why space is not
empty.

**Zu 4. **
The magic cycle as shown above
calculates the time for each event, with the 2nd part of the ½ spin particle
(or new: field) forming a whole cycle with the 1st part. Antimatter becomes
a cycle segment of matter here. It's the 2 pages of the same thing, but it's
only recognized as one thing in 4D hyperspace.

**Zu 5:**
At the beginning of this part 4, I wrote: A particle is no longer a field,
it is the state of the medium in that locality. Since fermions arise only in
S1 and S3 (S = field scale), they are in the octahedral formation. This has
a weak point of the formation in the center and reinforcement in the 3
diagonals of the corners in form of the same colors or states. During the
experiments in hadron colliders, only 3 energy traces can be found in proton
destruction. These in turn can generate only 2 values in the magnetic field.
This is the reason that 3 particles in 2 types (UP and Down) were included
in the theory. The "charge" as another value was purely computationally
divided so that triplet as a whole value (-) or (+) is formed. The magic
cycle replaces all values.

**Zu 6: **
A neutron is in the
basic formation of an octahedron. It has the mass-producing bending of the
center into the fourth space dimension, the 3 force-transmitting diagonals
and shows itself only in (+) time phase. It is the same as the proton, but
has no "charge," what means the magic cycle gives no detectable values. This
phenomenon is the result of the oscillating matrix. This means that a
process can happen at the same time with the same pulse in the same place,
if time is seen here as a umbrella term over the cycle time. Nevertheless,
the Pauli principle applies, since with the neutron 2 protons with the same
pulse are in the same place but in the unequal time cycle. A similar
phenomenon can be observed when 2 electrons with their charge field share
the same location in the K shell. However, it should be noted that charge
fields are on a higher scale.

**The Fermions**

**Quarks**

Before we get to the carriers of our world, we should examine the
carriers of the fermions. Although the oscillation of the center of
octahedra forms a field, it can only move out of the particle energy system
as a string. This is shows clearly the symmetry in the image below, where
the diagonals of the octahedron consist of strings with only one color (or
an equal property of the matrix space). They are part of the entire direct
attached space system, the octahedron, in whose center the 3 diagonals
intersect. It is the 3 space coordinates that bend into the 4th space
dimension (collapse). As oscillation, they bend perpendicularly to the
respective coordinate in 2 directions. Since the 3 new coordinates thus
formed do not belong to the 3 coordinates of 3D space known to us, you have
to imagine that the collapse of a diagonal is actually regarded as a
buckling that is increasingly not representable. Basically, a force (the
collaps) is not effective in 3D space, since each e-action requires a vector
quantum-mechanically. The compression therefore forms a tensor size.

In
the LHC (atom smasher) only 3 strings were found, which were then called
quarks. Since the measurement always shows the charge in the magnetic field,
charge was mathematically divided among the 3 strings (there called
particles). As we saw earlier, it is the oscillation of the matrix that
creates this phenomenon of charge.

Sadly the most important point of
particle physics such as quarks as false image has crept in and produced so
many chimeras.

**Fermions, the shell of Quarks**

The fermions are, as described above, field centers of effect in the 3D space plane. Therefore they are not really existent in 3D space, but they have an effect there. In principle, they cannot be moved directly through the energies of 3D space, but only through the deformation of the 3D space plane. From the aspect that, bosons are 3D energies and that, like any form of energy, they indirectly deform the 3D space. Bosons also have a weak effect on fermions. Fermions are power centers that move by attraction-repulsion. These are therefore deformations of the 3D space plane (which should not be circular evidence here, but a reference). It is the charge fields around these force centers, the primary and secondary field hierarchies, which are responsible for complex structures.

**Fermions and their Relationships**

**The protons** are the
primal race of particle. They are in their length in space-scale S1. This is
the first completely harmoniously balanced scale of the tetrahedra. It
consists of 4 colors as qualities of the 4 moments in the structure unit U1
(unit 1) see here
Basic struktur
. Part 1 of my webpage explained the reasons why the deeper scales
are unstable while the higher scales maintain the S1's harmony. According to
particle physics research, there are other family relationships in S1/2,
S1/3, S1/4, etc., which are unstable and do not form complex structures. The
proton is a force center in the size s1 octahedron in S2. The size s1 is the
bar size of the U1, a measure that I deliberately do not quantize and
compare with our natural world, because I think the obviously responsible
Planck's length is not safe enough.

**The neutron** consists
of 2 protons, which profit from the fact that because of the 2 time
directions the space is occupied normally only ½ and a particle in the same
place can be in different time values (which again corresponds to Pauli's
exclusion principle). Proton 1 bends up and Proton 2 bends down at the same
rate of oscillation. As a result, the effects cancel out in 3D space, but
not in 4D space. This means that the direct charge field or primary field
has no values, while the contribution to the space compaction remains due to
the spatial deformation. A neutron therefore has inertia and mass despite
the lack of charge.

**The electron** is the
little brother of the proton, it is perfectly alike, but packaged in an
octahedron of the U3 in S6. So it has the 3-fold bar length U3 in the scale
6. The octahedron space measures differently than the tetrahedral space.
However, we do not want to give this space any special units of measure and
continue to use the tetrahedral space. In the chapter of the octahedron
space it is shown in detail.

Here is the order: The proton octahedron has the size U1 in the S2. The
electron octahedron has the size U3 in the S6. Why does not the order go
from S2 to S3? Answer: S3 has the same octahedral size U1 (4 pieces). Why
not from S2 to S4) Answer: The S4 octahedron has the same colors at all
vertices and can not build up energetically. Why not S5? S5 would be the
same size and color as S4. U3 in S6 is therefore the next constellation with
the same positions and their qualities.

The electron is surrounded by primary, secondary fields like the proton.
Since the primary field is generated by a process of 4D oscillation, it is
achieved as an effect "first" in U1 / c. Since the octahedron of the
electron is U3, the effect will be 2 oscillation cycles later (color
change), which after the expiration of the proton oscillation always means
the controversial color. Let's recall the above maxim:

A particle is no longer a field here, it is the state of the medium at that location.

**The
neutrino **is one octahedral step higher than the electron. It has
the size s5 in the S10. It is set in the table of particle table as a limit
between fermions and photons. It's the lightweight of the "particle". The
neutrino, like the neutron, consists of two centers of force, which
apparently have no effect on the 3D space alone as charge carriers in (+)
and (-) time. This will be the probable cause that allowed us to discover
only the double centers as neutrinos. Perhaps experimental physics will be
able to prove to us once the charge neutrino as building blocks of aggregate
states. The game of the physicists with the instruments of the
super-collider of CERN can start here.

For the sake of clarity, it should
be explained why the above diamonds are a symbol of the spatial extent of
the fermions. As described above, it is the centers of the octahedra that
collapse into the 4th space dimension. It is not even the fourth space
dimension, where it is bent. It is the neighbor 3D plane above and below our
plane (which is actually a space referred to here as a 3d plane for the sake
of facilitating an idea).

The
fourth space dimension is only the direction, the vector of collapse. In the
neighboring plane, these collapsed centers of the octahedron again appear as
vertices of the octahedron.

These vertices increase the energy level of
the neighboring spaces or their octahedral. This creates a power play
between the 3D levels, which in turn has repercussions on the now
neighboring areas of the fermion. Here is a possible scenario of nuclear
nucleus formation (without bosons). But before this is explained, the wave
mechanics should be explained.

**Matrix- Fieldtheory– Wavemechanics, Transition-Zones**

It is one of the most difficult problems of the matrix and inevitably leads to a deep insight into the mechanics of the medium, which is called matrix here. The properties of the matrix as the material of the medium, which is responsible for all the geometric and energetic relations of things in the universe in general, can only produce one wave nature. However, these can show up in different wave types and field shapes. The above consideration of the different forms of oscillation show a swinging back and forth between 2 components as a moment of pulse and distance and its counter-vibration in the counter space or the bottom of the 3D space from the prospect of 4D space. Now the question arises, how does a moment begin, how does it run out and how does it become a counter-moment and it creates a balance. Since time was not involved in this process, the compensation does not seem to have been reached. The same oscillation in the (-) time provides complete compensation.

We should start from scratch: The simplest field is the sine field, it could explain the dual relationship of two colors. The upper part shows a multiple field of the same frequency. Even the sine field raises the question, why sinus? Physics sees it as an angular moment with the amplitude e = ħ * π / 180. So it seems like a 2D representation of a 3D spiral. The spiral in the minus time completes the circle. An ideal model of a photon. Even the passage of light through a polarizing filter is easy to imagine. Everything shows a quant e = h * F as a moment of the size of a quantum. However, as a local field for the binding of fermions such as proton neutrons or proton electrons, it is not suitable as an imaginary model.

**The multiple wave**

It
is a new wave type, the multiple wave whose source is a mass carrying
particle. This wave type is the cause of all fields around protons, neutrons
and electrons. If this wave is fully explained then bosons or gluons can be
left out of the description of fields. As debris in LHC experiments,
however, they are still existent. It is the local waves that generate the
specific spatial characteristics. These have 2 causes.

They arise in the
center of a fermion. There they are created with the penetration of the 3D
space into the 4th dimension at the highest frequency. However, this
oscillation of the fermion center with vector into the 4th dimension creates
a weak field as a tension in the 3D region. This tension is called the
pile-up of the centre colour, previously called Manko colour and the same,
when turning towards (-) time. It is similar to connecting a guitar string
to the sound box, which creates a tension at right angles, regardless of
whether the string oscillates from left to right or vice versa.

Well,
this tension has a very small amplitude of highest frequency, which is not
possible in quantum theory in EL space, if it were not generated by a 4D
vector. It creates a piled up wave, a multi- wave. If the Planck constant is
e.g. h / 10'000, a 10’000 wave are piled up until the 1st wave has reached
its length in terms of its small amplitude and reaches the surrounding
entropy.

Since these waves are very long, they can also be imagined as a
strings. Its nature e = h * F is a 1-dimensional formula. As such, it can
have the properties of gravity described by Newton F = G * 1 / r ^ 2. F
(Force) is then simply the number of strings / m^2 depending on the distance
to the center of gravity.

The
transition of the matrix structure to the quantum character and to the
analog fields can be imagined as 2 electric potentials in 2 clouds
interacting with lightning. With such an explanation an agreement of the
"field theorists" with the "quantists" would be conceivable. Unfortunately,
that has not been achieved yet.

The next picture shows a bunch of strings
that are part of a sine wave as a slight deformation. This brings us to a
new peculiarity in the nature of analog waves. It is the wave as deformation
of a base shaft. A good engineer knows that a string can hold a weight, but
if the weight fell at high speed, the rope would break. In our case, a local
area of very weak waves (strings) can form a local entropy or a train zone,
which in turn can be considered a medium for further waves. The theoretical
values like tension/pressure alternate in the real world. The string nature
would show sinusoidal waves opening towards the time vector, and the field
nature would show annular fields with outward increasing intervals. In
contrast to normal waves of the processes in wave mechanics, the distances
would have an outward enlargement corresponding to the shown pile-up
formation along a potential curve. A far more in-depth explanation could be
the idea of a string that stretches locally and periodical by relieving the
tension-situation by its stretching.

This relief in turn testifies locally a reduction of tension or, depending on the elasticity, even a compensating pressure range, which, however, immediately develops back into a tensile region where this mechanical process repeats itself. However, because of the base wave (F = G * 1/r^2), a different pull situation is created at each location, the side effect of stretching becomes smaller with 1 / r^2 and its length becomes longer due to λ = h/e.

Unlike Niels Bohr (whom I adore), the passage of classical physics to quantum physics should not be explained here with a mathematical potential of uncertainty. The quantum-theoretical location is determined by superimposing quantum-mechanical areas (superposition) over the wave-mechanical areas. This means that depending on the wave mechanical potential a quantum is possible or not. While Niels Bohr ordered the electrons a kinetic energy (rotation) in a field of negative energy (proton), we assume here a stationary and potential locality for electrons. The matrix shows the locations that lie with the quantum mechanical distances in the wave mechanical areas. The dispute of the "Studikuse", which of theories is more correct than correct, is eliminated and becoms obsolate. The picture shows that P.E. was arbitrarily set to (-) to prove the balance. Why (-). nobody knows.

**The Illusion of Particle-charge**

As we have seen in Part 2 of the explanation of the particle table, charge
can not be explained as a quantum number. Now it is shown here that this
property does not actually exist and is only the status of the place. The
matrix theory shows that all things that have a value in time (plus or
minus) must logically be oscillations or distorted oscillations (exceptions
some debris in CERN near Geneva). As oscillation particles can not have a
constant charge, this would indeed oscillate between + and -. And why should
(+) and (-) get attracted. They only get balanced. Also, values of a
possible fictitious charge cannot be repelled since (+) and (+) simply
culminate. What, for example is it what keeps the electron in "orbit"? It's
ATTRACTION! However, not the attraction of Bohr, which the nucleus secretly
and inexplicably exerts on the electron, but the attraction of the medium,
the matrix, whose network structure is shortened in this place and seeks
compensation as a condensed space. This space condensation is created by a
multi-wave as described above. The condensed zones attract themselves by
shortening the normal lengths of the rod lengths in the interactive areas by
the compensation and therefore the compensation with a movement (a force
with vector for space compression) happens. A space dilation would do the
opposite.

At least here it is clear that the particle attraction is the
same as gravity. The only major difference in particle size is that this
force can cause attraction AND repulsion. Depending on the point of view, it
is the dilated or shortened regions of the base wave (blue = E / r ^ 2)
which are added as (+) or (-) to the base wave and in the smallest scale
also a plus and minus of the entropy shown here horizontally. Make line
(red). As shown in the picture of the multi-wave, one ring (-) can now be
added to the amplitude of the center (the bending into the 4th space
dimension) as a Pauli rejection, a next ring as gluon attraction (+),
another as repulsion (- ), another as electron attraction (+) and so on. As
the potential curve has smaller and smaller amplitudes farther away from the
center, the rings (wavelengths) become larger and larger.

This is followed by the areas of crystal bonds, biochemical bonds, polymers and, in addition, the other states of aggregation. The rings in this representation are, of course, spherical fields around a center with the potential to pick up a quantum there. These spheres consist of a (+) time phase and a (-) time phase. This gives e.g. in the electron field 2 electrons, one (-) electron in the (+) phase and vice versa. Since protons are considered to be point sizes in our scale, the center of this base wave can contain several protons and neutrons, with the places for quantum (electrons) only available from the proton number in the center. To emphasize the main idea, an oscillation towards the 4th dimension causes a non-oscillating static wave with high (+) and (-) values close to the centre and more flat values toward more distant zones.

The areas of electrons per proton culminate. So you have a nucleus of 11 protons spatially the same electron area but with an 11-fold amplitude (multi-wave mechanics). The picture shows once again the difficulty of the presentation. While the lower curve uses y = e = amplitude and x = r and thus can be displayed completely in the 3D range, the upper curve y = oscillation with vector indicates 4D and x = r. The two curves are proportional. The matrix causes the oscillation of the electron octahedron to be shifted by 2 bars. Thus, it is opposite (+ to - or - to +) to the proton. The matrix forces the quantum of the electron region in the same place. The counter running is an equalization of the 4D vibration in this area (localer equalization). The phenomenon of LOADING is generated here. Of course you have the areas (or quanta) left and right in Neighborhood the same equalization, the same attraction, that is, the same proton-electron interaction.

It must be remembered here that in the 3D space reciprocity of the vibration is not possible, since the areas of the harmony or the equilibrium of the smallest scales are fixed locally. This because of the birth conditions of our universe. The +/- interaction of the phenomenon CHARGE are therefore the vibrations in the 4th space dimension, which, however, in our space dimension by the side effect pressure / depression generate and thus become effective (see article "The oscillation in space-time and pulse").

**What was achieved?**

In general, a separate field theory of the fields with oscillation in the
4th dimension was sketched (4DFT). There, the particles AND their fields
play in the same league. In practical terms, the hitherto quite mystical
quality of the particles, their inertia and the associated energy
requirements can be controlled directly by their fields. Electrical energy
can neutralize gravity and inertia. The recognition of 4-dimensional space
creates a new age with new paradigms, much like Copernicus, who drew a line
under the Ptolemaic world view of a flat world.

Christmas 2016 I began to describe my idea of a
space matrix in the web page "The Field Space". In 2017 and 2018, the ideas
in my mind and my 3D CAD platform grew into a zoo of solutions that demanded
a logical order. In July 2018 I began to document these ideas in a logical
sequence with word and picture. The individual topics actually produced
themselves and staggered me with their surprising solutions. I am convinced
that they are not really my ideas, but are intuitive. In me grew a new
picture of physics, which I really saw and not only thought. A new physics
that allows for a multiverse that gives time a new meaning and with the new
paradigms it links to metaphysics. Physics is no longer separate from the
mind and vice versa.

Gunter Michaelis, Griesbach, den 26.08.2019