Teil 4: Die Matrix erklärt die Partikel als Oszillationn
The above written, Part 1 to 3 of the MFT (Matrix Field Theory) creates a completely new basis of axiomatic assumptions and forces a paradigm shift for the understanding of physics. This is not just a field theory or quantum theory; it is mainly about a theory of the medium, here referred to as space-time-pulses..
A particle is no longer a field here, it is the state of the medium at that location.
From this point of view, CERN does not create any new particles; only the state and condition of the location changes. All forces, all interactions emerge from the disturbances of the original oscillation of space, of time (also it oscillates) and of the pulse. Instead of quantum numbers, only the state forms of the location are included in the calculation.
Quora-Fragee I answered in this way:
What is the operniianischee shift (Revolution)?
Martin Burschka hit the point. The Copernican revolution is often used as an argument when a new insight changes the paradigm and the old rules of exact list values hold against it, as happened then. Although Ptolemaic calculation was more accurate than Copernicus's, it was wrong. It is the old battle between idea (intuition) and rule (list values). Today, the majority of physicists still see the photon as a part-time particle, even though it's only a moment h, spin as torque where nothing can twist and space as empty, even being the hardest thing in our universe. Today we also have our paradigm shift.
In Part 4 the "particles" of quarks, protons, neutrons, electrons,
neutrinos with all their antiparticles are described in terms of space
geometry, time geometry and force geometry. They should be explained as a
special and stable state of the matrix. The preconditions, the paradigms
were described in parts 1-3. Here briefly addressed:
The zero dimension with value 0 gets a value as a multiple.
The resulting 3 dimensions of space form our conscious space.
All forces can be traced back as action of a fourth spatial dimension.
Time is the reason why 3 dimensions are consciously perceived.
The cause of time is the speed of light, which means simultaneity for us.
Time consists of cycles that end where they started.
From our relation this means 180 ° forwards and 180 ° backwards (spin problem).
Our universal cycle is in the (+) time, we experience an apparent (+) time-line.
Super Symmetry (SUSY) is the view of our world from (-) time.
The (-) time makes the full cycle (spin 1) to equilibrium.
These paradigms describe all forces, charges and particles as well as the photons. This description shows a fundamental solution without quantification. The measurement methods in Coulomb or Newton are not used, the Planck effect quant h is used as a unit. To demonstrate the implications of the paradigm shift, here's a YouTube video link:
Will gives a demonstration there with one of his jet ships, an approx. 1.00m VTO model, an example of gravitational-controlled propulsion. As a field-effect methodology it has no inertia or gravity. With enough energy, it could probably reach the speed of light, as space-curvature calculations by Miguel Alcubierre show.
It is not the only research model in the world. Already in the 40th of the 20th century high-voltage electricity was tried out on gravitation. Fatal accidents and many unexpected side effects such as time travel and teleportation were the results. The time was not (and probably still is not) prepared. National egoism turned this research into "black projects" and deposed them from official research and science. Today it can be assumed that antigravity drives are used militarily.
!!! Not every UFO is controlled from an extraterrestrial !!!
The MFT as the theory of new paradigms will show here the physical background.
A look at the medium from which fields (particles) consist
The tetrahedral octahedral structure of the Matrix allows 2 different spatial structures, which are visible depending on the angle of view. The tetrahedral space has a 60 ° structure and the octahedron space a 90 ° (orthogonal) structure. As I sad, it is the same space structure. Depending on whether the tetrahedron or octahedron is marked, the structure becomes tetrahedral with octahedral gaps or octahedral with tetrahedral gaps or interstices. Both perspectives are named here as MATRIX.
The edges of the structures are the connecting lines between the fields, shown here as 4 colored spheres. The 4 colors are the 4 states (++) (+ -) (- +) (- -), which in the constellation of the Matrix give equilibrium in space-time and pulses. The peculiarity of this equilibrium is that theoretically it can contain any density, strength and magnitude of energy without affecting the neighboring spaces. It can stand any scaling, the distances theoretically can have any size, even the Planckian length (1.616 * 10-32 mm). This records energies of e = h / ʎ = ~ 1.5 * 10 ^ 15 MeV * s. The importance of these numbers is difficult to estimate, since everything is unimaginably small and unimaginable values arise when scaling to our scale. It must be kept in mind that everything oscillates and the colors in the Planckian length Lᵨ change within Lᵨ / c or ~ 3 * 10 ^ -33 sec. That's why it's irritating to work with values. We work here with the scale 1 of the matrix and with the field distance 1 of the force as pulses of size 1 and the moment 1, which results from Pulse * distance (1 * 1 = 1) and is the invariable Planckian efficiency h. The physicist wonders what the relationships between force, energy and pulse are. Since power and energy were defined with space and time units that are not possible on the scale of the Matrix, the term "pulse" was used.
The basic medium is in the field scale 1
If pulse and distance are variable and h is invariable then Pulse becomes infinity at distance 0. It is clear that this makes no sense. A smallest size is required, beyond which the matrix would collapse. Suppose it is Lᵨ, then Pulse = ~ 1.5 * 10 ^ 15 MeV * s. We assume that this size pulse = 1 and the field distance = 1 is the field scale 1 described in the matrix part 1. primary structure
Also this scale should have a medium. However, we know that the scale ½ or ¼ etc. does not produce 100% equilibrium. The error in Equilibrium consists of 3 equal adjacent colors (see Part 1: Collapse to the Black Hole). The effect is there therefore a 3-fold pulse. So that the Planck's h is not violated as a rule, the distances at this location are 1/3 of the normal distance. It is the beginning of a general collapse, but it works only in the lower scales and is equalized in field scale 1 (S1) by 100% equilibrium. This forces us to assume that the field scale 1 is the basic medium, but that in principle allows higher standards. The arbitrary assumption that the base distance is at S5 (scale 5) or higher does not answer the question of "why" and thus remains wanton. It would be much wiser to assume that the base distance for the above reasons is at S1 (scale 1), but the Planck length would be much larger. This can only be clarified with the support of experiments, but is not relevant in finding the base size for particle formation.
Collapse of the bar force and bending into the 4th space dimension
In each scale (S) there is equilibrium of the 4 states, nevertheless
disturbances or in this case pulses from the environment are introduced into
the equilibrium systems of tetrahedron and octahedron. The system (e.g.,
octahedron) changes its state accordingly. In space: Bigger or smaller, in
time: Faster or slower. It transmits these disturbances back into the
environment until entropy is achieved, that means the disturbance will be
the same as the environment. The other side of the disorder would be the
collapse. Here: The bar force of the system cannot transmit the size of the
disturbance. As we saw in the article before, there is a bending into the
4th space dimension in the center of the affected octahedron. Well, when
exactly does this happen? The phenomenon bar force arises from 2
1. Resistance or elasticity of the medium (R = δ * L)
2. The kink force (KF), a moment h / bar length = 1 quant
While R (here light red) is a force / field space size S, the single bar force is anti-proportional to the force (e = h / L). Thus, R can be thought of as parallel to S, while KF gives a progressive curve. The 2 curves will inevitably intersect. Below is a panel of particles that intersects there where the neutrino is, as a limit of hadrons to quants (bosons).
This Table is an avalanche of paradigm.
A prima vista you see values of a 4th-dimension hyperspace are mapped to the vertical coordinate of 3D space. The 3D coordinate shows the different field sizes here from 1-12. The horizontal coordinate consists of the (+) time and (-) time. The new values of the table are the result of properties of the locality or Matrix. The left side of the list shows the excess force, which breaks the resistance in S 1-5 (bright red area) and bends into the 4D space (red bar). It creates the phenomenon of mass.
The new list:
1.) It shows the new values related to the geometry of the Matrix.
2.) The new values do not include the terms spin and charge.
3.) It shows the old values of matter and antimatter (black and blue)
4.) It shows the new values of (+) time and (-) time instead of matter and antimatter
5.) No quarks are listed. This is explained in paragraph Quarks.
6.) No neutron is listed. This is explained in detail in the paragraph Neutron.
To 1: In the scales S1, S3, S5, the bar force (force
relationships between the 4 states) are so high that the resistance in
entropy of space collapse. In scales S2, S4, the bar force cannot build up
and flows into the environment until entropy is achieved. The quantities <S6
generate beaming amounts of energy, here photons. The quantities <S7
generate energies that remain basically local, generate a field of high
energy (temperature), but which can´t be hold at the edges and strives for
To 2: This is the hardest to understand. A spin as a torque cannot happen in the Matrix because the object, which is to rotate, does not exist or is only a local state. The Stern - Gerlach experiment would give the same results if instead of spin an oscillation (+) (-) of time would be assumed.
Charge is a term invented by physics that is only explained by charge. If the term were explained by the axioms of space-time-force, then it would become obsolete. The MFT explains charge as oscillation of the (+) (-) time, where due to the size distance from S1 to S3 a static effect phenomenon of attraction between proton and electron arises, which is shown in the following table. It forms the key to a new physics that explains all "particles" with a harmonic balance of values.
The magical cycle solves the mystery of attraction or repulsion of elementary particles with cycle-related processes related to the medium (space-time-pulse). He explains why a proton is a space reduction that generates the phenomenon gravity on a large scale and the electrons mean a space magnification that creates a field that is drawn to the field of space reduction and creates the phenomenon of charge. At the same time, it is shown here that a huge amount of electrons (high V-voltage) are counteracting gravity, which has already been proved experimentally x times.
Here is a help to imagining: Normally, (+) (-) is introduced as a push/pull. The processes in the medium, e.g. ++ cycle (+ time, + energy) at h as an invariable are resulting as a space reduction. In the - + segment (-time, + energy) at h as Invariable results in a space magnification. Since the causing process is in (-) time, the effect applies only in the (+) time. This can be seen in the (+) (-) 90 ° segment, where the blue region displaces the red region.
To 3: The list refers to the existing opinion of physics
that matter and antimatter are two separate things. That is, they annihilate
each other, which is not possible in the MFT, since the equilibrium is an
oscillation, not an extinction. Mathematically, zero is not nothing but the
sum of components of a process. That's the main reason why space is not
Zu 4. The magic cycle as shown above calculates the time for each event, with the 2nd part of the ½ spin particle (or new: field) forming a whole cycle with the 1st part. Antimatter becomes a cycle segment of matter here. It's the 2 pages of the same thing, but it's only recognized as one thing in 4D hyperspace.
Zu 5: At the beginning of this part 4, I wrote: A particle is no longer a field, it is the state of the medium in that locality. Since fermions arise only in S1 and S3 (S = field scale), they are in the octahedral formation. This has a weak point of the formation in the center and reinforcement in the 3 diagonals of the corners in form of the same colors or states. During the experiments in hadron colliders, only 3 energy traces can be found in proton destruction. These in turn can generate only 2 values in the magnetic field. This is the reason that 3 particles in 2 types (UP and Down) were included in the theory. The "charge" as another value was purely computationally divided so that triplet as a whole value (-) or (+) is formed. The magic cycle replaces all values.
Zu 6: A neutron is in the basic formation of an octahedron. It has the mass-producing bending of the center into the fourth space dimension, the 3 force-transmitting diagonals and shows itself only in (+) time phase. It is the same as the proton, but has no "charge," what means the magic cycle gives no detectable values. This phenomenon is the result of the oscillating matrix. This means that a process can happen at the same time with the same pulse in the same place, if time is seen here as a umbrella term over the cycle time. Nevertheless, the Pauli principle applies, since with the neutron 2 protons with the same pulse are in the same place but in the unequal time cycle. A similar phenomenon can be observed when 2 electrons with their charge field share the same location in the K shell. However, it should be noted that charge fields are on a higher scale.
The Oscillation in space-time- pulse
The oscillation of the Matrix is based on the exchange of all values (4 colors) from the smallest scale to the scale of observation. From any size (scale) it is perceived as a static property. This is how the oscillating exchange between protons and electrons becomes a static charge.
These oscillation types have their compensation cycles every 180 ° and are considered equilibrium after 2x180 ° cycles. A shift of 180 ° would cancel out the effects of the cycles, which is permitted because a shift is only possible due to additional forces and their cancellation again generates the original situation.
Charge as an effect of the Matrix
the most difficult depictions in the limited 3D world demands the topic of
charge. This, like everything else, is an effect of the Matrix without a
property in itself. The vibrational amplitude with vector into the 4th space
dimension (actually it should be called D5, if D0 is the 1st space
dimension, 4D is the tradition) and its effect on the space density can be
represented as follows:
The medium of 3D space requires a minimum volume in 4D hyper space. In S1 it is 1, in S2 2, etc. If this space is deformed in the direction 4D, then there is a space compression / decompression. This generates different force vectors in 3D space due to the balance tendency or elasticity of the medium. The illustration above shows the deformation produced by protons or electrons. Underneath a phase shift by a neutron is shown. As shown later, 2 protons out of phase can neutralize the effect of the charge without losing the vector-to-4D deformation, indicating here the conservation (or slight increase) of the mass or gravitational effect. One of the most difficult introductory acrobatics requires the phases that are traversed by an interaction of the fermions. A proton in S2 (the first octahedron appears in S2) will interact with the space size of electrons only 2 color periods later in S6, since the color periods as well as the space sizes act with c. For the sake of clarity, the color combinations or their changes are always assumed to have an absolute simultaneity (v = ∞), but the interactions must take into account the speed of light c. If in S2 the collapse of force in the center of a proton is red (++), then the collapse in the center of an electron in S6 is always the opposite color (-+). The term charge is here explained by the deformation of space and its reaction as elasticity, the details are explained later in chapter Fields of Charge .
The space of octahedral
The picture shows an octahedron (red as size s1) in the center of an octahedron of size s3 with the same center. Bottom right with purple lines marks an octahedron of size s2. The image is intended to show the sizes and color constellations with focus on the octahedron in the matrix. Visible here is a 3-set of colors colors in octahedra s1 and s3. The octahedron s2 has all its vertices in white, which means that forces are not held here, but mediated. This representation shows here 1 octahedron s1 (red in the octahedron s3) 6 octahedron s1 (purple lines in the octahedron s2) and 19 octahedron s1 in the octahedron s3. If the representation focused on tetrahedron, then S1 would be none, S2 1 and S3 4 octahedra. Since the tetrahedron is the only form that can form a medium of x arbitrary energy and forms a complete equilibrium per tetrahedron, we must see the tetrahedra as the bearers of our physical reality, and consider the octahedra only as interstices. While the tetrahedral structure of the matrix is absolutely stable, the gaps allow various modifications. In explaining the particles, therefore, only the octahedra must be considered.
SUSY the Super Symmetry
As a first thought-exercising, we must approach the 4th spatial dimension. Opponents of 4D space must realize that each space dimension can be limited to only one dimension and that then all happenings in space would be accessible only by hard-to-understand number-acrobatics. The concept of the 3D space can easily be extended to other dimensions. We just have to find the right symbolic representation. There is no sense, to calculate with imaginary numbers or other highly mathematical tricks without any imagination, just to avoid the 4. spatial space concept.
We will approach the 4th space
dimension step by step.
First an image that represents the 3D space as a 2D surface. An idea that everyone can understand.
Then we tilt it. Although this process is complex; we take a 2D object with a 3D representation and subject it to a 3D process to see it as a 1D image. Nevertheless, it is not difficult to take all these steps.
⇒ Now we
approached the situation where 3D space became the line.
⇒ In the subatomic area, this line gets a thickness; otherwise it could not be real.
⇒ This thickness has a value in the 4th dimension. It results in a 3D space on the top and one on the bottom. Both are the same, they form a whole. The interactions in the upper 3D space have a direct influence to the bottom one.
⇒ The actions of both 3D spaces are oscillations between pressure / tension. Your connection acts as a moment. The layer in the center is the medium of the 3D space, that is, the scaled-down Matrix, which becomes increasingly stiffer and firmer due to the Planck efficiency (e = h / ʎ). This causes the moment to become a hinge point, with its actions on the top of the 3D space becoming a counteraction on the bottom of the 3D space. It is these counteractions, which are recognized by the Platonic way of thinking as the super symmetry. Although a number of anti-particles have been found and proven experimentally for mathematical and symmetrical reasons, the majority of physicists struggle to recognize the SUSY.
The Matrix, an oscillating Medium
The maxim: "to explaining a lot with a few" is assumed here that the matrix is scalable as a structure, with the smaller scales being the medium of the larger scales. Further, it is assumed that all interactions are 1-dimensional in this quantum scale. 2-dimensional energy levels are the result of a multiplicity of 1D-strings, e.g. gravity. Also, by imagining fields (3D spheres) in GFT, only 1D action strings or linear effects can be accepted. An oscillation is the permanent exchange between 2 values. An oscillation between 4 values is actually 2 x 2 value oscillations.
The picture above shows two 2-valued oscillations, which in 3D represent a tetrahedron and here in the 4D representation a blue-red quartet. The red-red oscillation is an extension / compression of the 3D space. The red-blue oscillation is in the direction of a 4D vector. It collapses in the central line and finds the compensation in the oscillation blue-blue. It is the medium of our physical space. It is a basic representation on the way to the representation of the fermions.
Here the picture shows an impact from the 4D space into the entirety of the 3D space. Since this happens as a local field in the fermions, the area is very limited and is spontaneously balanced by the reaction in the adjacent space, resulting in a 3D oscillation that pours into entropy.
The most important element that
leads to the explanation of the fermions is the oscillation in the 4D region
of 3D space, where a strain / pressure oscillation by a conversion to (-)
time gives moments on the opposite side of our space. There, all values have
the inverse values. Shown here with the red (+) area, which turns twisted
into the blue (-) area.
By the twist is the backside of the red area the blue one and also in reverse the blue area the red.
In that sense, it's a split kind of Möbius tape. If also would be shown the compression / tension cycle and here represented as colored areas, then the Möbius Band would be complete.
The deeper scales in 3D space (shown here as violet streaks) are the absolute medium, that seems to contradict the general relativity of spatial relationships. This ultimate medium is actually a black hole, but it is not a local (difficult to understand) hole, but it is in the depths of the cascades of interacting scaled fields and their medium, which in turn are fields what again need a medium ... etc
The next picture shows a tetrahedron, the ultimate unit of space with the two oscillations, which sum up to zero and are perpendicular to each other in their vectors. The blue-red oscillation generates the time with V = c. The (+) (-) oscillation is a rhythm created at the birth of the Universe under unimaginable pressure, yielding a pattern or simultaneity in the present phase of the Universe. Mathematically one could say V = ∞. This is a condition that requires the logic of the matrix.
The oscillation of octahedral
If only the tetrahedra are considered, then generally only the medium is meant. Local and temporal disturbances of the medium can only take place in the space sizes 2: 4: 6: and so on. The matrix of 3D space lets these disturbances radiate with V = c into the surrounding space, whereby only the e-entropy is increased. Only bosons can be explained with this process. The octahedron with its weak spot in the center, which is activated when its vertices get surplus values, is the logical candidate for explaining the fermions
In the so-called "empty space" its vertices are balanced by the reference to the tetrahedron and have no value for the octahedron. The valueless octahedron becomes a gap. Only when the local energy level is increased, then energy increase in the gap and the octahedron becomes a local energy structure. The condition of a harmonic equalization of all moments creates in its center the deficiency color. It is the balance and the missing color in the octahedral formation. However, it is only a compensation of the color (quality of the moment) and not the energy. The only possible balance of energy is the bar forces, or here the one-dimensional relationships of the vertices. Again, the shorter the more stable. The collapse of the tetrahedron to the next smaller scale means an increase in the bar force of 2 ^ 2 = 8. The collapse of the bar forces of the octahedron vertices to the center would require an increase in the bar forces of 3 * √2 = 4.4 units. The deficiency color of the octahedron therefore collapses before the possible collapse to a smaller scale. Therefore, the deficiency can bend only in the vector of the 4th space dimension. By this process, the forces in the 3D space are balanced again, and the octahedron becomes again a gap without values. However, the relationship of the scale-forming bar forces and the diagonals of the octahedron does not take into account a general cosmic constant of the resistance to bend into the 4th dimension what is assumed here. This cosmic constant but was included in the above "Table of Particle".
The fields of Charge
The deficiency color becomes the independent quality of vector oscillation in 4D. This oscillation is theoretically no longer an oscillation of the 3D space and would disappear from our field of vision. However, it creates a deformation in the 3D space plane that has a local effect like a local standing wave. This deformation of the 3D space plane creates its own dynamics of repulsion and attraction, which is referred to as the effect in space 3D by physics as a charge. These deformations create concave and convex planes on the top side and in opposite directions on the bottom side of the 3D space plane, which form their own quantization of the charge fields with their mutual distances and thus determine their size. For convenience, all of the following fields are called charge fields because they balance with their neighboring fields and are thus able to build complex structures. Our world on our scale is formed from these complex structures, their roots being in the oscillation of deficiency colors in the formation of octahedral
The fermions are, as described above, field centers of effect in the 3D space plane. Therefore they are not really existent in 3D space, but they have an effect there. In principle, they cannot be moved directly through the energies of 3D space, but only through the deformation of the 3D space plane. From the aspect that, bosons are 3D energies and that, like any form of energy, they indirectly deform the 3D space. Bosons also have a weak effect on fermions. Fermions are power centers that move by attraction-repulsion. These are therefore deformations of the 3D space plane (which should not be circular evidence here, but a reference). It is the charge fields around these force centers, the primary and secondary field hierarchies, which are responsible for complex structures.
Fermions and their Relationships
The protons are the primal race of particle. They are in their length in space-scale S1. This is the first completely harmoniously balanced scale of the tetrahedra. It consists of 4 colors as qualities of the 4 moments in the structure unit U1 (unit 1) see here Basic struktur . Part 1 of my webpage explained the reasons why the deeper scales are unstable while the higher scales maintain the S1's harmony. According to particle physics research, there are other family relationships in S1/2, S1/3, S1/4, etc., which are unstable and do not form complex structures. The proton is a force center in the size s1 octahedron in S2. The size s1 is the bar size of the U1, a measure that I deliberately do not quantize and compare with our natural world, because I think the obviously responsible Planck's length is not safe enough.
The neutron consists of 2 protons, which profit from the fact that because of the 2 time directions the space is occupied normally only ½ and a particle in the same place can be in different time values (which again corresponds to Pauli's exclusion principle). Proton 1 bends up and Proton 2 bends down at the same rate of oscillation. As a result, the effects cancel out in 3D space, but not in 4D space. This means that the direct charge field or primary field has no values, while the contribution to the space compaction remains due to the spatial deformation. A neutron therefore has inertia and mass despite the lack of charge.
The electron is the little brother of the proton, it is perfectly alike, but packaged in an octahedron of the U3 in S6. So it has the 3-fold bar length U3 in the scale 6. The octahedron space measures differently than the tetrahedral space. However, we do not want to give this space any special units of measure and continue to use the tetrahedral space. In the chapter of the octahedron space it is shown in detail.
Here is the order: The proton octahedron has the size U1 in the S2. The electron octahedron has the size U3 in the S6. Why does not the order go from S2 to S3? Answer: S3 has the same octahedral size U1 (4 pieces). Why not from S2 to S4) Answer: The S4 octahedron has the same colors at all vertices and can not build up energetically. Why not S5? S5 would be the same size and color as S4. U3 in S6 is therefore the next constellation with the same positions and their qualities.
The electron is surrounded by primary, secondary fields like the proton. Since the primary field is generated by a process of 4D oscillation, it is achieved as an effect "first" in U1 / c. Since the octahedron of the electron is U3, the effect will be 2 oscillation cycles later (color change), which after the expiration of the proton oscillation always means the controversial color. Let's recall the above maxim:
A particle is no longer a field here, it is the state of the medium at that location.
This is the reason that physics sees the charge as a local immutable quality, since proton and electron always attract each other (-) to (+) or (+) to (-). The fact of an oscillation yields no change in the result.
The neutrino is one octahedral step higher than the electron. It has the size U5 in the S10. It is set in the table of particle table as a limit between fermions and photons. It's the lightweight of the "particle". The neutrino, like the neutron, consists of two centers of force, which apparently have no effect on the 3D space alone as charge carriers in (+) and (-) time. This will be the probable cause that allowed us to discover only the double centers as neutrinos. Perhaps experimental physics will be able to prove to us once the charge neutrino as building blocks of aggregate states. The game most physicists with the instruments of the CERN Super Collider can start here.
What was achieved?
In general, a separate field theory of the fields with oscillation in the
4th dimension was sketched (4DFT). There, the particles AND their fields
play in the same league. In practical terms, the hitherto quite mystical
quality of the particles, their inertia and the associated energy
requirements can be controlled directly by their fields. Electrical energy
can neutralize gravity and inertia. The recognition of 4-dimensional space
creates a new age with new paradigms, much like Copernicus, who drew a line
under the Ptolemaic world view of a flat world.
Christmas 2016 I began to describe my idea of a space matrix in the web page "The Field Space". In 2017 and 2018, the ideas in my mind and my 3D CAD platform grew into a zoo of solutions that demanded a logical order. In July 2018 I began to document these ideas in a logical sequence with Word and picture. The individual topics actually produced themselves and staggered me with their surprising solutions. I am convinced that they are not really my ideas, but are intuitive. In me grew a new picture of physics, which I really saw and not only thought. A new physics that allows for a multiverse that gives time a new meaning and with the new paradigms it links to metaphysics. Physics is no longer separate from the mind and vice versa.