### Axiome

The field space as an explanation for everything cannot really explain itself. The theory needs only 2 axioms: space and time. However, the space tension should also be considered axiomatically, since it consist space and time, but is also there base. Spatial tension is the tendency of space and time to revert any deformation to the original state. If the space tension is zero then the space and time would have no values and no reality.

### Reality

In order to gain values, the space forms a geometric structure that can generate and maintain equilibrium of all the stresses and tensions. By means of a cyclic compensation of tension into a counter-tension, the time also receives its basic elements in the form of cycles. From this point of view, space and time form the frame, which is filled with smaller and smallest space / time particles. These smallest space / time particles can be scaled up to the scale of our normal world, making our space / time world real. It is to be noted that space and time were determined by themselves, they are axioms.

### The new concept of Time

Up to the theory of relativity time was absolute, independent of the other
physical values. Emanuel Kant said: if you could stop the time, nobody would
notice, since no time would have passed. Nassim Haramein said, time exists only
by memory and memory could not yet be located in the brain. It is an attempt to
build a bridge to consciousness?

Einstein united time and space to space-time. Since then, time is dependent on
the energy status of the space. With V = C or the end values of the
Schwarzschild equation, time can freeze to zero. It stops. Quantum-theory
indicates, that time also is in quants, they interact in cycles.

The theory of the field space continious here and shows the time from an
absolutely exciting side. As shown in the
matrix
chapter, a tetrahedral /
octahedral space structure is the most dense filling type of the space. In
principle, a space of fields with not gabs. Each field pulsates in a cycle of
4 properties as the field type of a
fermion. That means, it shows (+) (-) values on our
side of the space and (+) (-) values in the SS (supersymmetry), the other side
of the (4D) space. On the SS side, all values are reversed, all vectors (all
space coordinates) and even *
time*.
This means that time is running backward. In one whole cycle all internal field
conditions become balanced with the total of a
zero-value.

Each field at the corner points of the tetrahedron has a time-shifted cycle. Since the partial cycle reverses all values on the SS side of the space, it has the same spatially location at as the field with the partial cycle on the side of our space. In the chapter matrix this is represented symbolically by 4 colors, thus a spatial structure, which is the condition of a maximally packed space. The arrangement of the colors shows (the pix left) that all 12 arms, which connects a field with its 12 neighboring fields, can be brought into an equilibrium with only 4 colors.

Why did our science fail to prove the (-) time? Not quite: In the formation of a (-) and (+) electron by the Compton effect with X-radiation, a backward vector of time is assumed. The same in a Beta decay. Also Feynman diagrams need a (+) (-) time.

It is an assumption at the base of our picture of the world that a 4D space and an SS (supersymmetry) exist. This fulfills the condition of perfect cycles in the smallest and largest. Though what is about the linear flow of time we experience? The answer lies in a huge cycle of cosmic scale. Until Einstein, no one has noticed or questioned the curvature of space. The space was interpreted as linear, on our scale no curvature of the universe was detectable. In this huge cosmic cycle, all beings made of small cycles (matter carring fields) see the flow of time as linear. In the cosmic scale, however, linear time in our cultur becomes the symbol of a serpand that bites itself into the tail.

All fermions with spin ½ form a perfect cycle that captures space and time. They have their own space and their own time. It should not be forgotten that mass and inertia are phenomena of our space-time, see masse and inertia

All other physical energy- and field-types with spin 1 are partial cycles with a perfect space cycle in a superordinate time cycle. The same applies to gravitation with spin 2, since this is only an effect from the point of view of our instruments, which can never evaluate the wavelength of x lightyears as a whole. Thus, the sinus-curve becomes ∞, (+) and (-) simultaneously exists.

**The Space-Time-Continuum**

Einstein prooved mathematically that space and time are affected in the same way by the Lorenz factor, which transforms the values to the speed of light as the maximum speed. Many discoveries and results have hardened this theory. But since physics still retains its original concept of time, it has regarded time only as one dimension, a dimension with only a forward direction. They gave the space 3 dimensions in both directions to (+) and to (-). However, a spacecraft flying forward at 90% light speed for 3 years can fly back, but in time the 3-year return wilol add to 6 years . Even the values are correct, this time concept can not explain the mathematical equivalence of the relativity with the space. The "grandfather paradox" forbids any physicist to accept a possible return. Time seems to corrupt the conceptual image of an overall framework, the concsiousness as the big frame.

**The Cycle as Equilibrium**

Now we recognize that time and space must have a common origin. In this theory of field space
it is the axiomatic cycle in the matrix. The recycling of time restores the original spacee
and time of the cycle. If this cycle is not embedded in larger cycles, space (the same place)
and time (re- turn) would valued to zero. Our world could exists only in relation to superordinate
cycles. This is a verry importand recognition. It shows us the direction of our
ponderings to understand the way, how concsiousness appears to us.
The small basic cycles stand for the reality of space and time, the larger ones
for the recognition of space and time, where time appears to us as a linear
floating time and space as endless.

A center
of time is much more difficult to imagine then a spatial one. A time senter would also allow
time (+) and (-). However, there is still a significant difference between space and time.
In space I decide the direction: either forward or backward. In time it is not possible.
Why? We have a physical body and a mind. The mind is relativized to a superordinate larger cycle.
It recognizes larger areas of the space and can freely decide in it. This does not apply to time.
The time cycle is immense, it is unimaginably large. It is the time cycle in which the knowledge
of the whole universe is embedded. The space cycles are unimaginably small in relation to this cycle.
Their limiting range is the size of electrons. There, too, the free decision of the spatial
direction becomes just as impossible as a decision in the time direction.

**The relativity of cycles**

To put it briefly: The apple in my hand shows me only the positive side of the phenomena space
and time, but not the negative side. The (-) side of the space here means the other half
(1/2 spin) of the
fermions that make up the apple.

Viewing the spin of ½ as a torque rather than a cycle will confuse us and let us forget the
logical aquire of a supersymmetry (SS). There, the negative side (from our prospect) conceal
equal
parts of space and time. While space has a (+) (-) clycle on each side, time needs to cycle all
two sides (spin 1) to become equilibrium. That is the reason, why time on our side of the SS has only one direction.

The full freedom of decision in space and time lies solely in consciousness. While the space
is always relativized by a reference point, no reference point is set in time. This is because
our consciousness has a time cycle beyond our imagination, while the space around us
is manifested already
by the size of an electron as a reference.

**The big cycle**

Our world is based on the smallest space-time cycles wichf forms further
superordinate cosmic cycles, which lead science to theories of the "Big Bam"
or to the "big crunch". Indian Vedas call it the great "nothing" or
"unconscious", which could only be interpreted here with the smallest cycles of
perfect harmony as an absolute bondage and thus non-consciousness. Interestingly,
our science interprets a condensation of the cosmos to the smallest possible as
the highest thermal entropy. The theory of the field space, however, sees here
the cascade downshifting of the field space structure into smaller scalings and
therefore the reduction of fluctuatings or (from a philosophical point of
view) the enlargement of harmony and thus to tider bonds of freedom.

From a cosmic point of view, time is shifted down to near zero
status and then
it re-emerged after passing the zero point as a new cosmos of a supersymmetry. On our side of the cosmos will begin a
completely equal period from non-consciousness to the highest freedom of the
mind. It is the greatest cycle we can see, so great that time appears as
straight parallel lines.

It should be keep in mind that we are embedded in several mega cycles. Our next
environment has an electro-magnetic mega-cycle, which in turn is in a
gravitational cycle, what its true nature is also electrdynamic. Further cycles between the Sun and
"Sagittarius A", the center of our galaxy and between all of the galaxies are still unknown cycles and
culminate to values, that a sequence in the time flow is not possible.
Consequently, the time becomes visible as a fantastic formation of many cycles
of (+) and (-) time flows. The theoretical reference framework of our science
here is
still slumbering in a medieval attidute.

**T h e p e r f e c t c y c l e**

The serpent, which bites itself into the tail is an ancient symbol of a cycle.
Nevertheless, tail and head is not the same. It is a cycle that can not be repeated
without the assumption that it is part of an even larger cycle. The head transforms
itself to the tail, but remembers the pre-cycle, so the new cycle is a new quality.
Geometrically, it is a spiral. The spiral axis is part of a much larger cycle. To
understand the true depth of the meaning of the term cycle, it must be possible to
explain all processes of our world as cycles. This can only be a purely theoretical
requirement, since the smallest partial cycles are inbedded in superordinate cycles.

Thoughts on the meaning and significance of the greatest cycles in our world give
us a concept, which prescribes the direction of thought, from our prospect.
A way of thinking that leads us to the smallest cycles that become a paradigm and
give us an idea of time, just as the matrix gives a paradigm of space. The smaller
the cycle, the more perfect it becomes.

**Physics of the Cycle**

The smallest structure of the field space is the matrix or spatial arrangement
of the smallest fields (like the idea of Planck's distance). There are space-points,
which are arranged by alternating compression / depression in a way, that all neighbors
have reverse values. The logic of the equilibrium requires 4
states of a field, whereby the field with 12 neighboring fields is in an equilibrium.
The search for a thought-model inevitably leads to the assumption of
a supersymmetry (**SS**). With the assumption of the SS, a field cycle has the following
4 states:

State 1 = Compression on our side of space

State 2 = Depression on our side
of space (state 1-2 is 1/2 spin of fermions)

State 3 = compression in SS

State 4 = Depression in SS (state 3-4 is the
"missout" 1/2 spin of fermions)

These 4 states create an equilibrium in an arbitrary field cluster.
They oscillate at the same time and form a perfect cycle together with the backward
running time. The perfect equilibrium was the original demand for a harmonic invisible
space of the highest tension (space-time force), from which all the phenomena that
form our world emerge. This requires the expansion of a spatial domain to its zero
tension, the compression of the space up to the maximum tension, the transforming
of the tension occurring there over a zero time into a backward running time and
from there into the deflation of the space / tensio until again zero tension.
The perfect cycle.

**Philosophy of the cycle **

A perfect arrangement (matrix) of the space structure in perfect cycles and
equilibrium produces the absolute harmony, but also the absolute unfreedom.
The higher these structures are scaled, the smaller the binding forces involved,
the greater the possibilities for mutation, the greater the freedom, but the greater
the possible chaos. At the end of this thought the absolutely free spirit stands apart from
absolute chaos. At this point the mind separates from chaos. The chaos, however,
without the force of the mind is compressed with the universal force to an absolute
equilibrium, the cycle begins from the beginning.

It is pitty that philosophy today is not physics and the other way round. It is the mechanistic
thinking and ignorance, which separates both..

**The 4 dimensional space as a pulsating field**

As in the Fieldspace are explained, reality of 3D-space can only exist in a
4D space frame. What are the indications, that proof the physic of 4D space?

There is the explanation of Einstein's space-time. In what otherway space can warp than in to the 4.dimension.

The nature of all fermions gives us a good explaination by including 4D space in the consideration. We know, that
electromagnetic fields are culminate, sum up or cancel eachother, what is not happen with fermions. A space fluctuation
with a vektor to 4D, a tensor where is rectangular to all 3D coordinates, would match the acquire. The fields wouldn't culminate
with neighbouring fields and thus obey Pauli's exclusion principle.

Gravity needs to be explained by the 4D space. It is a warping to the hyperspace.
Further information you find in
Gravity

**Why Black Holes can’t exist**

Even
100 years ago, Einstein knew that masses of huge size dilute time up to the
frozen state. Simultaneously geometric lengths are shortened toward the centre
of mass to allmost zero. In short, because of the infinite inertia at very high
mass values, the location of the mass centre can no longer be moved, a black
hole has invariable space coordinates, it fixes the relative space and makes it
absolute.

If cosmological black holes were fixed, galaxies could not have a crossover
or move to something like a big attractor, what astrology predicts, if the
Haramein-atomic-holes were fixed in the subatomic size range, then Haramein wouldn’t be able
to move.

In the Field theory a Black Hole is adequately replaced by the octave-moderated
staggered densities to almost infinite density without producing a singularity.

**Die Theory of the standing wave**

Actually instead of "wave" should be a pulsating
field with periodically changing conditions and instead of
"standing" a field with fluctuationspeed C' = <C . According to the
standard model, a pulsating field can not be slower than C if it is
not held by something. The gravitational field of the earth is held
by the earth, the electric field of the conductor, the magnetic
field of the magnet, the atomic charges of atomic nuclei, etc.
Everything is held by something of mass. Fields are fixed by mass.
Only: who fix the mass?

The present theory of field spaces, which is
ultimately based only on the axioms of space and time, and sees
space and time as space-time, and therefore a theory of a single
axiom, sees mass only as a phenomenon of spatial density. For better
understanding, a field behavior in "normal" space, i.e. the
so-called electromagnetic 3D space. The amplitude of a quantum is
peaked 9 times (zone 1).

It is a normal case of an energy discharge with a
certain frequency. The discharge occurs like a normal light source
with the intensity of E = e / d ^ 2, where d is the distance from
the source. Only when the overtension E is reduced and d has reached
a certain distance, E quantifies to e = frequency * h
and escapes as photons. Such cases all have the speed of C and
culminate with each other. This scenario can never be used as an
explanation of particle as standing waves. Standing waves like
fermions do not culminate, they obey the exclusion law and move with
V<C.

These classical laws are based on a space with the
properties of *h* and C. These values are theoretically
unfounded and purely experimental. They are the signs of our space.
As shown above, there are still other spaces or other qualities of
the same space, which have different *h1* and C2 . When the
stability of our space breaks down, the peak of the energy pulse
penetrates into the range of an other spatial quality and is subject
to the laws there
The density of the space is considerably greater, the
ratio of *h2*, as the red line shows, is steeper, and on the
basis of the density, the relativity theory predict a smaller time
and C than in our space. The point of transition causes a kink that
could theoretically be represented in this way but could also be
parabolic rounded, which only could demonstrated by experiments.
The distance d1 is the time when the amplitude of
space 2 changes from (+) to (-) and the momentum space 1 is
neutralized thus it cannot flow further into the room. The resultant
d is at the same time the fundamental frequency of the Fermion. The
graph is very general and does not take into account the quantum
effect, which is also present in space 1 and 2.

The space density of our space is assumed to be the
same everywhere, but is different in the vicinity of massive
objects. Here, however, we speak only about the transition from
normal space into a space of much greater density, the point of
transition of which is inside a fermion. The Fermion therefore has
two faces, one to our space and one to the higher density space.
Since we can only measure things related to our space, all
measurements in the LHC systems lead to irritating results. It is
clear that the field space theory is not limited to 2 spatial
qualities. Downwards as well as upward, additional spaces of
different densities must be assumed. Singularity can't achieved. We
have to see clearly that we are the rather thin Flux on massive
spatial densities and thus have no direct possibilities to directly
control the other spaces in the experimental sense in the same sense
as Heissenberg's uncertainty theorem.

The above scenario is only apparent from the
prospect of our 3D space. If the
density of space exceeds its elastic capacity, then the space structure bends
into the 4th dimension. Quantum mechanically, and from the point of view that everything
happens by momenta, the bending into the 4th dimension also results in a return of the space
tension bending in the opposite direction. This in turn fulfills the condition of an equilibrium.
A fermion is thus a field with a vibration vector in the 4th dimension. This event therefore calls
for a counterpart, as also a sheet must have a back side. A paper without a back side would not
be 3-dimensional and therefore not real. The fourth space dimension therefore requires the
supersymmetry, the back side of our 3D space.

1.Original Version Dez. 2016 2.Version Dez. 2017