T h e    F i e l d    S p a c e

a philosophical approach to physics

  T h e    U n i v e r s a l    L a w

It should not be discussed how an universal law is, but how it should be. Time, space, force are phenomena of an universal law. The manifestation (or recognition) of our world, a world which we recognize and conceive as thinking beings, is regarded as the decisive picture. This world, with all its illusion of misrecognized phenomena, should be deterministically subtracted into a single law. With this prescription, time becomes a phenomenon equal to space. That is, it runs (+) and (-) in all directions of a multi-dimensional whole of force, space and time.
The symbolic image above shows the 3 axioms of universal law.
It shows a wave, a symbol of the vibrating force, the pulsating pulse, red as pulse in our world of appearance, blue as pulse in the supersymmetry, the other side of the 4D space.
It shows the space as upper and lower side, each balanced by the wave of (+) (-)
It shows the time, only forward on the upper (our) side and only backwards on the lower side.
An equilibrium of force, space, and time, a combination that makes all the phenomena of our physical world into phenomena of a single law. It shows the field of the matrix.


Proclamation: Spin is a period and has nothing to do with a torque. The period is the cycle of the field, nothing more or less.

In the standard model of physics, the spin value classifies the elementary particles in bosons (spin 1) and fermions (spin ). As early as 1922, the so-called Stern-Gerlach experiment showed a directional quantization with the cleavage of a silver atom beam in the magnetic field, The beam was divided into the (+) and the (-) direction by the magnetic field so that 2 dots were produced on the then common glass plate. A line of points from (+) to (-) was expected. This effect was interpreted as a rotational spin of the silver atoms, and so it remained to this day. However, the spin was considered to be part of a whole period (+ | -), which is why a particle was evaluated as a (-) side and (+) side as a spin, which is an acrobatic consideration at this time (even to day). In the course of time, the image of physics has been further developed in such a way that the idea, that quarks, electrons, protons, etc. are supposed to have a spin (torque), which is only given in values ​​of , 1 and 2, seems absurd.

Today they speak of a spin-krises. Torques can add up or subtract, taking the angle into account. This would mean that with today's spin theory there could exist only 3 torques with only one angle, an absolutely absurd assumption. In CERN (LHC in Geneva, Switzerland) the results of research on the proton were interpreted as "a sea of bosons, quarks and antiquarks". It is inconceivable that, under these circumstances, only spin would result in the addition of all torques of fermions. What a coincidence !!!

The field space theory offers a better solution. Instead of SPIN, CYCLE should be used. The particles are fields standing wave. that fluctuate and therefore have a periodicity. They can also independently have torques with one or more axes, which however appears as a convolute of fields and has nothing to do with the quality, which is today called SPIN. Fermions have spin (cycle) , a periodicity which can be explained simply and logically only with the assumption of a super-symmetry. The exact description of this periodicity would define almost all physical elements such as mass, inertia, and space dimension, and even time. In this context, I shall describe only a symbolic image of the concept.

The field of Fermion contracts, all vectors pointing to the center. The center is not a point, but a radius > zero. The vectors still have a certain distance there. The field pressure is < ∞. It is therefore not a black hole as a singularity, as is assumed by Nassim Haramein. From there the internal momentum of motion of the field goes to the MUTUAL, that is, In the supersymmetry (SS). There will turn left to right, etc. The time is backwards (from our point of view). It is actually the birth of time, for time in our world is also a (cosmic) period, within which the time appears linear to us (with a linear vector). The momentum of the vectors of the fermion field runs to zero (likewise an equilibrium) and the process reverses. This creates two periods, one on our side and one in the SS. These two periods, however, are linked by the field center and are in this view a perfect period.

The above graphically attempts to represent the three known spins as a comparison from the perspective of the space density (vertical) and the period (horizontal). The graph for spin is therefor  not shown correctly, since the SS and the time inversion were not possible for the comparison of the spin types.

Spin : The peak of the spatial density breaks through the region of the space with the known values ​​C and h and reaches a denser space with the values ​​C '<C and h'> h. Thus, the field is fixed, that is, It does not discharge into the space but is held back by the region C '<C. see also ( standing wave. )

Spin 1: It is a pulse field (a free E-quant) which is completely balanced in a period but remains as an impulse and evolves into following periods. A period is referred to herein as photon, gluon or boson. The field can be flat or round. A spin would not make sense, since polarized light would not be possible. see also ( standing wave. )

Spin 2 The standard model (SM) assigns spin 2 to the graviton. It is assumed that gravitation, and thus also the graviton, is a force separate from the other forces. However, this is not necessary in the field space theory. Gravitons are photons. The effect of Spin 2 or the fact that only one-half of the gravitron is evaluated after a period, which means that it takes 2 periods to show a graviton, is due to the following reason.

As shown in the Graphics chapter standing wave, a culmination of E quanta (photons) causes a discharge of the field with the curve of the ratio of h. Since gravitational fields with unimaginably small energy are generated, the discharge lengths of light years are large and the period also lasts for years. Therefore, it is assumed that the discharge curve is horizontal (charge without discharge). Therefore, only a portion of the total period can be found from every E-quant or photon. This means that only one state (+) or (-) is seen thus only period. Thus two periods are therefore required for the experimental observation of an entire photon (+ | -).

What does that mean? A Fermion (itself as a whole period) appears as a period, it then disappears again as a period into the SS and has no effect on our world in this (-) time. It is also the reason why there are 2 electrons on the first electron path.

An interesting aspect is the (-) time. In principle, therefore, a fermion can occupy the same space of its counterpart, thus the entire tetrahedron structure of the imaginary basic space would have a double occupation of fields (particles). Naturally, this would not alter the quality and theoretical value of the basic space or so called "matrix".


Gravity is not a separate force but the effect of large fields. A quark e.g. is a small field area in the centre of a number of larger space fields whose largest could be in a cosmic scale. Their effect would never be individually detectable if they wouldn't culminate with the inconceivable number of their neighbours. Gravitational fields are not different from other physical fields. Their effect is known as attraction and repulsion. While we are dealing traditionally with the attraction here in the solar system, we do not see the antigravitational effect of the protective and repelling belts around earth and around the solar system. However, these produce the optical effect shown below (see bottom picture). If these rejection zones were not present, then the univers would collapsed to the 4. dimension and become lumped to a super sun. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solarmap.png#/media/File:Solarmap.png
The above figure shows the logarithmically shortened distances from the Sun to α-Centauri. The field Sun - Kuiper Belt will probably be a main field. The rejection fields of the planets could be interpreted in such a way that the planets (with their typical disturbances) lie in the wave valleys of sun its side fields. Here it is roughly seen that Earth - Saturn - Hydrogen Wall lie in a logarithmic integer ratio scale. For the optical effect of the star chains mentioned below, further and substantially larger fields of action are responsible. To understand gravity, you have to consider the size of its fields. A big filed has a centered realm of the size of our sun systen or even bigger. If this realm is filld with masses 10 or 100 times bigger then our sun system, the size of the field is allways the same. Each fermion as mass carrier has this size of the field. The values of a fermion as the Planck size are unimaginable small, but the unimaginable number adds up to the measurable range of a force field. because of the field size, no vibrational effect can be recognized, no quantum effect can be found. But in some cases like a super nova, the birth of a neutron star, quantum effects could become observable. It might be the reasons of pulsars, who are created in a flash and therfor all their mass carring fermions are also created at once. That could be the reason, that the vibtational basic fields (matrix scale) of their fermions are culminating in the manner, to create culminational peaks of their phases of compression / depression what in turn could be visible in the flashs of the pulsar.

The consideration that space is a field-space based on a field matrix and everything in our visible world are fluctuation of this field-space requires that each field be balanced in the environment space. This means that all fields have compensation-fields in their perimeter, which also protect the field so that it does not unite or culminate with neighbouring fields. If these fields are included in the energy calculations, the results will not require exotic values such as black holes or dark matter.

Here the quintessence of our ponderings:

⇒Gravity is not a seperat force, it is the effect of large fields out of the range of our meassurments.

⇒The nature is not gravitational or part of the electromagnetic space, it is a field of culminated fields where act directly in the fabrique of the field space.

⇒Thus, it doesn't have or need gravitons.

⇒The main effect of attraction is caused by the multible effect of space warpings what appear by multible mass density (General Relativity).

⇒Gravity is the best proof of the existance of the 4. spatiel dimension.

⇒That is the reason, why we measure at each space point 2 conditions, a compression and adepression state. We interpret this as spin 2, what in real is a spin1 (or one cycle).

Antigravitation is proven here !!!

To prevent the  universe to implode to a total collapse, gravity must be balanced with equal energies by antigravitation. This is finally proved by a common picture (see below) of our sky.
Gravitation is a function of mass, but what is antigravitation? Of course, this is a wrong question, because mass is an unclarified statement in physics, and gravity would the function of something that is not explained. Gravitation was explained as a deformation of space by mass with tensor into the 4th spatial dimension. Nevertheless, gravitation is a field as well as antigravitation.
As shown in the standing wave. image, h can be steep (high density) or flat (low density) in a field. The gravitational effect is so weak that h is so flat that the field frequency (fluctuation of the field) takes years until the weak pulse reaches the quantum size (lightyears long wavelength). In practice it can be assumed that the amplitudes of the field culminated by mass concentrations (stars), no discharge of pulses (slope of h in the graphic of the standig wave article) takes place. This culmination of amplitudes  also applies to the tensor direction of the antisymmetry.  However, this is not an antigravitation,it is the counter-field that follows the gravitational field.

This wave mechanics is thus repeated several times. Above we see the Kuiper Belt, below we see the star strings, which were formed by fields of the size r = several light years. The upper image of the camera shows how gravitational fields have a telephoto effect and antigravation fields have a wide-angle effect. This effect has nothing to do with the gravitational lenses of NASA images. When we look attentively into the sky of our galaxy, we notice strange round or partial round star-chains, evidence of great field effects of the stars as centres of the gravitational fields. These are optical effects caused by a gravitational centre what focused the visibility toward the centre and creating an optical vacuum. The field periphery, on the other hand, scatters the visibility and creates a visual concentration. It collects the visibility of the stars behind it and forms optical chains. This phenomenon is seen throughout the sky

- and no one has noticed it -.

1.Original Version Dez. 2016, 2. version Dez. 2017